I haven't checked your profile in weeks and when I did I was checking to see if you'd been banned. You stalk me, Hans and ton of other guys too. So don't go there. Regardless when I see you on a Kovalev thread of course I'm gonna see what you're posting he is my favorite fighter after all.
Hahaha, it wasn't even as close to McDonnell/Kameda. But at the end of the day, I never said Kameda/Mcdonnell being a robbery is fact like you did. It was my opinion and the opinion of the majority of opinions I SAW. Does that mean Kameda won and there is no argument for McDonell? Of course not. Only someone like you who is clearly trolling or just trying to start an argument would claim that someone winning in a close fight is fact, and use IB as an example on why it's a fact.
I stalk you? LOL, dude I barely pay attention to you, and I highly doubt you've ever seen me on who's checked your profile last. THe only times I would have been on there is if I was pming you and I clicked on your profile. If I've replied on threads you have, it might be because you literally LIVE on this forum and you're on every thread.
Negative. That is you. Every close fight where either the black guy or the none Brit doesn't get the win in a close fight, or not a close fight, is a robbery according to you: e.g. Porter v Brook, Lee v Quilin, and now we can add to the ever growing list- Kameda v McDonnell If Brook v Chaves is a close a fight as Bradley v Chaves later this month everyone, EVERYONE knows you've already decided to score it for Chaves and any other result will be a daylight robbery.
Yeah I'm crazy as hell to use the official scorer of the site we're both on, who happened to have the exact same score as I did to back my score up. Same way you just used the 99% of the morons who scored the fight for the PBC website....no bias there:roll: to back your opinion up.
Lee/Quillin I scored it for Quillin, and Kameda/McDonell I scored it for Kameda. When I say robbery, I'm saying I SCORED it for that guy. Having Quillin and McDonnell winning is perfectly reasonable, having Mares beating Santa Cruz is not. As for Porter/BRook liek I said, I was trolling for that scorecard.
The difference is I used it to back my opinion up, but I didnt act like it was a 100% fact like you did.
when I say robbery just like Quillin/Lee, I'm saying I scored it clearly for one guy. Of course you can make an argument for Lee drawing, but I thought he won. So to me it was a robbery.
atsch How you've changed your tune.... you've gone from 'I changed my mind' after you was bounced round the forum like Jeff Lacy was bounced about like Calzaghe...to 'I was trolling' I just don't think you can score a fight for 5***
If you barely pay attention to me or don't stalk me then how the hell do you know what I'm doing all the time to make accusations like you just made.
I haven't changed my tune at all, go check that thread, I clearly said right after that I was trolling and I was mad because Brook held so much, and broke records.
Ellerbe is this true ???? did you call it a robbery 5 or so minutes ago ? now you are claiming it could of gone either way? are you therefore playing around with your points and hoping nobody would notice? oh ellerbe, oh my, oh ellerbe :think
If you mean accusations of stalking, I just assumed you stalked those guys cause I literally ALWAYS see you on the last 5 people that checked my profile. You're also literally here EVERYTIME I'm on here, and no I'm not stalking you it's just hard to avoid someone who makes constant threads, and is posting like 50 times a day.