What Rule Changes Would You Like To See Implemented In Boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jeff Young, Aug 31, 2009.


  1. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    For me, I would like to see judges reveal their scorecards after each round, it would cut down on some of the controversy of close scores.....

    What is your suggestions to make boxing better?
     
  2. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    Couldnt do that. Then the boxer's would know where they stand in the later rounds. Best case you would end up with them running when they know they have won enough rounds. Worst case you would have them wanting to end fights over cuts cause they know who's winning.
     
  3. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    well then it would expose them to what kind of fighter they are, there is always a chance a KO/KD's change the scores in a blink of an eye....

    and you could start revealing the scorecards after round 4 to cut down on fighters trying to get NC's
     
  4. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    I've never been a fan of public scorecards, for every positive scenario you can put forward to support it theres a negative one.
     
  5. Black

    Black Member Full Member

    477
    0
    Aug 15, 2009
  6. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    I came up with this in one of the countless Diaz/Paulie threads.

    Have an international body of judges and referees. Any promoter who wants to have a sanctioned fight must only use this body. This would need to be a federal mandate in every boxing country.

    The promoter has no say in who the judges and referee will be. In fact, they wont even know until the night of the fight.

    Once the fight is finished, the performances of the ref and the judges would undergo peer review. The reviewing judges would be anonymous and could be from any country. The result of the fight is not official until the review is complete.

    I imagine the review goes like this: 5-6 judges watch a replay of the match and score the fight. The average of their scores is seen to be the most correct score.

    Judges or referees who fail peer review tests are then put on notice. If they **** up, they lose their license and have to repay their fees.
     
  7. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    Ya i think it would make it worse.

    I think you definitely shouldn't have hometown refs or judges. You should have to have neutral ones. I mean it happens in all other sports that i know of, soccer, rugby ect.

    For example, fights including a fighter from Texas, Canada, Germany, should not be allowed to have judges or referee's from those locations. I don't understand how this can keep happening.
     
  8. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    Good idea, well thought out. Thats the problem with boxing though, no one organisation, no accountability.
     
  9. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    it wouldnt work, it creates incentive for the leading boxer to rest for a round and run in later rounds

    also, the betters continue to bet during the fight
     
  10. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    not neccesarily, betting would end as usual before the start of a fight....

    I'm with rushman on this as well, you dont see the nba or nfl, or soccer owners pay the refs, in essence its a bribe when house promoters pay the salaries of the judges and refs......

    you could also maybe add a 13th round to cut down on the draw scenario, but then people would question the health of the fighters....
     
  11. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    betting continues even during the fight
     
  12. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    I really don't see the impact of it on the fight, just the betters....

    how about having a union for the judges, and the union pays their salaries.....and the union chooses who judges where to make it neutral.....in the nba the refs have a union...
     
  13. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008
    The bell used to indicate the end of a round should be replace with a large horn like those from big ships...:D


    This content is protected

    .
     
  14. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
    I think championsip/tittle fights should still be sechuled for 12 rounds but have 3 extra rounds in the event of a draw after 12. Scores should be submeited after each round and a running score shale be kept but not reviled intel after the 12 rounds to insure there is no delay to start the first extra round.
     
  15. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Officially, judges are meant to hand in their scores after each round anyway so I don't think showing the scores would lessen any perceived corruption. It wouldn't stop judges who have been "influenced" in other ways giving biased scores and doesn't account for incompetency which, I feel, is the main source of poor scoring in boxing.

    I would like to see the alphabets banned from boxing. It wouldn't actually be that difficult but would require cooperation from the boxing bodies around the world.