either. the general consensus of the pac/jmm rematch is that it was a very close fight that could've gone either way. imo, it would've been a draw but the KD swung this very close fight in pac's favor.
Actually the general consensus seemed to be that JMM won a close fight and Pac was lucky to get the nod(even he agreed to that). NOw how about your scores for JMM/JC:deal
i actually had it as a very close fight. so, imho it wasn't a robbery like jmm fans say. jmm seems to be involved in many very close fights. sometimes he will get the decision like in the mab fight. but sometimes he will not like in the john, norwood and pac fights. he should really try to win convincingly against the top opposition and not let the judges entirely decide his fate. also, it would really help if he can avoid being KD'd especially in close fights.
Won't even give me a score , I call Bull****!:hey You have never seen that fight, just admit it and let's leave it at that:deal
agreed. in the mab fight, mab could have won if the referee did saw the knockdown and mab didn't pull that ***** move of punching marquez while down.
no. i don't think that was a general consensus. as for pac agreeing to that, he was just being humble and very gracious as a host when jmm confronted him in his own homeland. actually, it was pac who showed class in that meeting while jmm didn't. but in a subsequent interview in radio w/ jmm, pac said "marquez, you're a fighter stop crying." there is a thread here that actually deals with this.
no. i definitely saw it out of curiousity due to the claims of jmm fans here that it was a robbery. like i said, i saw the complete fight in youtube. kindly don't put words into my mouth.
You know, I saw the video that caused all the outrage amongst Pac fans and I still can't see what it was that JMM did for you guys to whine so much. He merely stated the obvious and simply asked Pac for a rematch, isn't that what most of us expect from all boxers:huh