point of the article and study was that the nandrolone produced natually by the body after prolonged exercise is not even close to the threshold where someone could even test for false positive.
or maybe....he trained real well knowing that he's going into an archrival country to fight a top fighter?? :huh ....just sayin :roll:
No the point of the article is that results are unreliable based on such a weak sample. I could take a sample of the first 15 people to walk past my house in the morning. If I see 5 women and 10 men would I be right to conclude that 33% of the earth's population are female and all the rest are male?
http://www.active.com/soccer/Articl...help_you_avoid_a_positive_nandrolone_test.htm i give up, you win. salido was the false positive in the 10,000 tests.