Roy Jones is the best fighter Clazaghe faced followed by Chris Eubanks and Bernard Hopkins but obviously BHOP fought JC in the stage of his career where he could be competitive.
I have it like this 1. Kessler 2. Lacy 3. Eubank 4. Hopkins Hopkins was p4p one of the best in the world where Joe fought him, and no one else in that class could have made him look so abysmal Eubank - after reading Joe's book i know how hard a win that was, fantastic performance Lacy - breathtaking Kessler - even better than the Lacy fight cause of the standard of his opponent. Kessler looked unstoppable, gave Joe some hellacious shots, and looked to be on his way to a possible stoppage win. Joe somehow transformed into a completely different fighter midway to leave the Dane clueless
the eubank win is very underrated. don't listen to all the haters excuses and bull**** about eubank only losing because he was shot, weight drained and came in as a late replacement. he wasn't shot. he was only 31 years old and he turned up in excellent shape. and besides it was just as difficult for calzaghe to fight a different opponent to the one he'd been training for as it was for him [infact more so because eubank had the experience of dealing with these type of things before]. calzaghe had been preparing to face steve collins [who had a completely different style to eubank] and he had just as little time to prepare for the late change as eubank did. sure, it wasn't a peak eubank he fought [just as it wasn't a peak calzaghe eubank fought], but he was still a very formidable challenge for any 168lb fighter in the world, especially an extremely inexperienced bambino like calzaghe who'd hardly fought any rounds up until that point and had never been the 12 round distance before. and all this nonsense about eubank only having two fights in two years prior to facing him cuts no ice either. everyone who followed his career knows he'd had a hectic schedule in the previous 3-4 years prior to losing to collins for the second time, and there's absolutely no doubt that the time off would have allowed his body to recuperate and done him the world of good both mentally and physically. he still had plenty left in the tank after getting whipped by the bambino calzaghe to engage in two almighty wars for the ages against the very dangerous, big punching wbo champion carl ''the cat'' thompson [who would later go on to slay none other than the future unified cruiserweight champion david ''the hayemaker'' haye]. eubank not only gave ''the cat'' hell, but he actually came within a whisker [pun intended] of licking his ass [again pun intended]. the simple truth is it was an extremely impressive performance by calzaghe. maybe not his best win [at least he could thwack a lot harder back then], but it's a very underrated victory. ***cue rebuttal from an unbiased hater***
Lacy was the best performance without a doubt. However, why isn't his first fight with Veit not in the poll?
His performance against Hopkins, even though it wasn't pretty, was the most impressive to me and here is why Hopkins is regarded as one of the very best at outsmarting, confusing and frustrating opponents. Calzaghe is still to date the only one who turned the tables and beat Hopkins at his own game. After Calzaghe adjusted his fight plan, Hopkins was befuddled and frustrated to the point of trying to fake low blows and get point deductions. Apparently he also got hurt worse by Calzaghe than most will admit because he walked to the wrong corner a few times and looked dazed in the corner People initially tried to claim Calzaghe won only because Hopkins was shot, but the Pavlik fight which was one of the best of Hopkins' career disproved that, not to mention HOpkins' previous fight was also one of the more impressive performances of his career