What was hattons best weight? 140 or 147?

Dude that actually makes it looks worse because it means pacquiao fought bradley who is moving in weight

 

^^^So he held his own vs a past prime pac? So that right there proves Bradley is not a terrible fighter at 147 pounds cause he held his own vs pacquiao but yet hatton held his own vs mayweather in the first 5 rounds but hatton is terrible at 147 pounds??? OMG!!!

 

Actually you just owned yourself lmfao. This means pacquiao fought a junior ww that moved up in weight to fight pacquiao lolol Congrats.

 

^^^I know i mean imagine Pacquiao fought a prime 140 version of bradley at junior welterweight??

 

Hatton is better at 140, IMO lost to Collazo, and obviously beat Zoo at 140.

But my thing is I see the usual idiots in this thread try to use that as an excuse to diminish Floyd's victory. And my opinion is this. Hatton challenged Floyd for his title. He rolled the dice to jump up in weight to try and dethrone the top guy in the sport and got KO'd for his trouble. No shame in trying and that doesn't take away from Floyd's win. In the sport of boxing, thousands of fighters have tried the same thing over the years. Some have succeeded and some haven't. Why now, does it all of a sudden become an issue?

 

Pac****s dont want to admit the truth but back in 2005 Floyd who was at 140 pounds wanted to fight Hatton but hatton at that time didnt want to fight floyd because even hatton said he wasnt ready yet. I mean how can he not be ready if he easily beat kostya to become the real 140 pound champ? Wasnt hatton at ringside when floyd easily destroyed gatti? How come hatton didnt call out floyd doing that time at 140 pounds???

 

So you've got your excuse and you're sticking to it. You just to scared to come out and say it.:good

 

And you think Bradley would have beaten that version prime collazo??