Funny you underline that quote but ignoring that in 2005 hatton who was at ringside when floyd easily destroy gatti, didnt called out floyd which he could have going to ringside like what mosley did after mayweather easily beat marquez. Hatton could have easily called out floyd in floyd vs gatto post press conference but didnt. Hatton was at ringside cause he was hoping and pray gatti would win in a huge upset so hatton would fight gatti. <<But hey go ahead ignored that.
According to Hatton, the best version of him died that night at the Floyd fight. Never the same again.
I think Collazo in his prime would have beaten bradley. Same collazo really beat a prime undefeated berto.
Dont go back tracking son. Collazo beat an UNDEFEATED and prime berto therefore he better than bradley.
I been asking a question many times way before i mention undefeated berto atsch But yet you ignoring it. AGAIN WHICH FIGHTS BRADLEY LOOK GREAT AT WW?
man stop deflecting already. Tell me how collazo is better than bradley because he beat ATG berto according to you
atsch Again you ignoring a question. Collazo is way more proven ww then Bradley was correct doing the time bradley before facing pacquiao at ww? But yet bradley lets say moved up in weight to fight a prime proven ww collazo, bradley would easily beat him???<<If thats the case then which fights bradley look great at ww? (I bet you will ignored it). And btw when did i say berto was an atg? atsch
We do know bradley is performing better at welterweight than hatton? do we not? anything else is irrelevant.