What was hattons best weight? 140 or 147?

Whatever I say? I just laid out the facts for you . Casuals only obsess about pac and Floyd, and you clearly are one. Pac****s never like to debate in facts.

 

I don't only post about pac/floyd though. If anyone clicks on your thread history or post history, they'll easily see that you're a casual, and that you started watching boxing recently.

 

Hatton was not fighting Floyd at his best weight of 130 so doesn't that make things even in that regard? Or is Floyd just better than Hatton?

 

he best wins were at 140 but he couldn't make towards the end of his career. money talks and that's why he took pac at 140

 

Shhh! These haters won't let facts get in the way of a good troll thread. This is true, PBF wanted Hatton at 140 when both were at that weight after he beat Zoo but was turned down by Team Hatton saying he wasn't ready. Blame Hatton for the fight not happening at 140 back then.

You can't expect PBF who just fought Oscar at 154 to go all the way back down to 140 to fight a challenger. Especially since Hatton never demanded that the fight to be at 140. Hatton said the weight wasn't an issue and he could spend more time training at 147 than cutting weight for 140. Hatton never made any excuses so why should haters?

 

Hatton turned down PBF back in 2005 at 140 that is undisputable troll.:hi::deal

 

it doesnt matter, Floyd still beat a better and undefeated hatton!:yep

 

180 - Fatton