One wonders how old a fight has to be before it becomes eligible for the Classic Section? Not a complaint ,just an inquiry.
This must be the Klitschko nuthugging wankstain set response whenever Sanders-Wlad is mentioned.. It doesn't even have anything to do with the question asked. Wankstain.
Because he was taking everything lightly. Vitali was complaining about his bad attitude and excessive partying etc.. Wlad was just a gym god and simply didn't think anyone could hurt and just tried to knock every opponent out of the ring.
another first too - he was the first longterm HW champ to get poleaxed instantly by a retired 37 year old neverman. when the going went against him against crap opps, he cant find the way to win.
Still going to go down as a top 10 ATG heavyweight though. I bet that burns you doesn't it, yes, yes it burns.
no - lewis beat prime rahman up in the return(the guy who poleaxed prime corrie), that is why we know he mistook him first time. wlad was destroyed and never rematched to prove he took him lightly. That measn all we can assume was that he was hopelessly outmatched by a shot retiree at age 37 who had never won anything above domestic in his career. the two cases are by definition absolutely different.
your opinion have never bother me, but obviously my facts bother you enough to reply how you just did.
Lewis was tentative in the rematch infact he was stopped in his tracks off a jab. Also he didn't take Rahman lightly at all in the first fight, Rahman was causing him problems and he got caught coming off the ropes in a very amateurish fashion and he paid for it. The series finished 1-1 if anything Rock deserved a third fight but you Lewis fans believe in lucky punches and being 28lb over weight and various other excuses.
There are certain people in life who's opinion I respect yours isn't one of them. But the fact is Wlad got KO'd by Sanders and it was never avenged, but what he's gone on to do makes him a top 10 heavyweight and he's still going at 37/38 about to take on Pulev. ATG pal.
good thing you weren't narked into replying to one of my opinions then, since you were replying to a fact.