What was more exciting: Khan-Kotelnik or Bradley-Peterson?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by dftaylor, May 10, 2010.


Page 2 of 2
  1. loginistooshort

    loginistooshort Active Member Full Member

    1,010
    0
    Jan 30, 2010
    He's no chump. No the greatest he will face but calling him a chump is ludicrous.
     
    loginistooshort, May 10, 2010
    loginistooshort, May 10, 2010
    #16
  2. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    4
    Oct 21, 2008
    I get impression some people haven't seen Bradley-Peterson because it was a really decent fight. Pisses all over Kotelnik-Khan
     
    Mandanda, May 10, 2010
    Mandanda, May 10, 2010
    #17
  3. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    People are just looking at the scores rather than watching the fight, assuming Peterson got beaten out of sight. Each round was hotly contested, but Bradley just did that bit more each time - better punching, more consistent, better defence. He won most of the rounds, but that doesn't tell the story of the fight.

    Kotelnik didn't have the tools after the first two rounds and nothing changed till the last three, when Khan got on his bike and played patty-cake with his opponents forearms.
     
    dftaylor, May 10, 2010
    dftaylor, May 10, 2010
    #18
Page 2 of 2