What was the best era of heavyweight boxing?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Dec 20, 2019.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    My pick is the 70`s by a long way, does any other era come close or even out-do that decade?
     
  2. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,208
    19,483
    Jul 25, 2015
    The 1790's were an awesome era for Boxing!
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,229
    Feb 15, 2006
    70s.

    There was talent, and the big fights got made.

    The latter element failed, in both previous and subsequent eras!
     
  4. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
  5. AwardedSteak863

    AwardedSteak863 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,063
    11,261
    Aug 16, 2018
    70's are probably tops. I also think the 90's were pretty damn good with Lewis, Holyfield, Bowe, Tyson, Foreman, Moorer, Mercer, McCall, Morrison, Ruddock etc.
     
  6. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,470
    9,485
    Oct 22, 2015
    From 1963 to 1979 Liston, Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Holmes, all at the absolute primes of their careers and the willingness to fight each other. Factor in the very goods ( Fighters that probably win championships in other era's especially today's) like Bonevea, Patterson ( who was a champ) Terrell,Mathis, Williams,Quarry, Norton,Ellis,Lyle,Shavers, Young, and other decent fighters that on any given night could have a great performance and surprise a ATG. That time span was the best in Heavyweight boxing history in my opinion.
     
    Golden_Feather99 likes this.
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,563
    36,126
    Jan 8, 2017
    1970 s,
    1990 s
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  8. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,901
    Mar 3, 2019
    An era that sees a prime Ali, Frazier, Foreman and Holmes is very hard to beat. Then add in the top contenders like Norton, Young, Quarry, Ellis, Mathis, Lyle, Mac, Shavers ect.

    1965-198(or there abouts) is the clear winner imo.
     
  9. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    70s seems like the best. Even the contenders were the tops. I think they got a big push of the bigger heavyweights in the late 1960s and early 1970s with Ali ,, but mainly after Liston came in and stopped Patterson, which then changed the whole division. I think Liston beating Patterson was the turning point with heavyweights. The Marcianos and Pattersons and Johanssons were the thing of the past. The real division with bigger guys went forward.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    I don`t think Foreman was that good during the 90`s.
     
  11. Oakland Billy Smith

    Oakland Billy Smith Active Member banned Full Member

    1,102
    1,108
    Oct 19, 2018
    Most people agree upon the 70s. I'm sure it was a fine era, but I wasn't born until 1980, so i can only speculate and try to catch old youtube videos.

    In my lifetime the 1990s were the best HW era! Three legendary top bosses like Tyson (even though he was already washed up, his mystique still followed him) Holyfield and Lewis, plus a whole slew of great contenders and even great journeyman fighters.

    I do believe fighters of the 1970s can claim to be slightly better athletes, since they fought more often usually, and fought 15 round fights....
    But as a fan I actually prefer 10 and 12 round fights over the 15 rounders.

    I notice the 15 round fights usually have a much longer feeling out phase, and usually don't start picking up in pace until after the 4th or 5th round anyways. They also seem to go the distance more often, which is fine of course, but I feel guys in the 90s were legitimately going for the KO more often than not, which made for more exciting fights
     
  12. Oakland Billy Smith

    Oakland Billy Smith Active Member banned Full Member

    1,102
    1,108
    Oct 19, 2018
    Foreman wasn't that good in the 90s, he was just well matched, but he was still damn fun to watch
     
  13. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,101
    15,581
    Dec 20, 2006
    I know from scoring fights with a few guys that 10 rounders are so much fun to score. Even in the 15 round era there are tons of 10 rounders. Fatigue conditioning and stamina become less of an issue, and the action and punch volume increase drastically! Count me in as another that loves 10 rounders
     
    Oakland Billy Smith likes this.
  14. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,599
    Dec 10, 2014
    I agree - 1970s.

    1970-1975 was the pinnacle.

    You had an all time great in Ali and then a bunch of guys who could test him and a couple who beat him.