What was the hardest heavyweight era?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Kell Macabe, Dec 7, 2021.


What era was the strongest

  1. 20s

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 30s

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 40s

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 50s

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. 60s

    1 vote(s)
    1.9%
  6. 70s

    34 vote(s)
    65.4%
  7. 80s

    4 vote(s)
    7.7%
  8. 90s

    10 vote(s)
    19.2%
  9. 2000s

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. 2010s

    3 vote(s)
    5.8%
  1. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,720
    Apr 20, 2010
    Do you believe, that the present era is weaker than, say, the 1930s (which you see as underrated)?
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Overall probably.
     
  3. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic Who is ready to suffer for Christ (the truth)? Full Member

    7,226
    7,701
    Nov 3, 2021
    Dont forget James J. Bradock.
    I agree 30s underrated, and pick 70s.
     
  4. tommytheduke

    tommytheduke Active Member Full Member

    629
    165
    Nov 21, 2013
    I completely forgot Braddock. By 'Bum of the Month' i was not referring to a decade (30s or 40s), like most here, but what happened between say 1938 and the mid 1940s.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,591
    27,260
    Feb 15, 2006
    If Ring Magazine gave him a higher rating, based on what I think he will do in the future, then I am very flattered.
     
  6. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,492
    13,047
    Oct 12, 2013
    Agree it is stronger than the 60's or 70's....just too many big hard punching and skilled heavyweights
     
  7. Bigcheese

    Bigcheese Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,926
    2,513
    Jun 7, 2015
    I might go with 80s. You had Tyson, Holmes and Holyfield at the top. Then about 10 or so very talented contenders if they were switched on.
     
  8. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic Who is ready to suffer for Christ (the truth)? Full Member

    7,226
    7,701
    Nov 3, 2021
    ... Earnie Shavers ...
     
  9. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,720
    Apr 20, 2010
    You think that a huge 6'6", 245lbs, 14(12)-0 fighter being ranked 9th in the world right now by The Ring, tells us how bad this era is? A former Olympic medalist, with a long amateur career behind him, who turned pro at the age of 25 - and is now raising fast in the pro ranks, where he so far has only met opponents with winning records. Why is this a sign of a weak era?

    How about Eddie Mader, who in 1935 was the 6th ranked contender behind Braddock? A Journeyman with a 33-19-4 (11 ko defeats!) record when he was ranked - whose highest weight until then was 188 lbs? Mader, incidentally, finished his career with more ko defeats than ko wins with an overall record of a 57(27)- 41(29)-9... not something you see every day from a world ranked fighter!

    Do you think, someone like Mader would come even close to a world ranking today?

    And shouldn't little 5'7", 170lbs Mickey Walker's #5 HW ranking in 1931 tell us something about the strength of that era? Can you imagine him being thrown in with any of the top heavyweights today... I certainly can't!
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2021
    Furey likes this.
  10. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,604
    18,197
    Jan 6, 2017
    Holyfield was not at the top in the 80's. He didn't win the title until 1990 and he only had a handful of decent wins at HW.

    The main problem in the 80's was that some guys just weren't fighting each other or would have one good win, then fall off or lose their title immediately. They weren't consistent and were often out of shape or on drugs.