What was your personal score card for Mayweather/Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ripcity, Nov 29, 2012.


  1. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    I said 8-4 to 10-2 Floyd is fair. 8-4 if you give Cotto all the close rounds and 10-2 if you score all for Floyd.

    I mean what rounds are you giving Cotto. 1? 2? 4? 5? 7? 10? 11? or 12? This are pretty clear Floyd rounds.

    So that leaves 3 and 9 as the close conceivably Cotto rounds. Ok you score all for Cotto 8-4.


    So I don't see how you can criticize the judges. He'll Harold Letterman gave the fifth to Cotto. Cotto slapped Floyd on ass after the round cuz he knows he got outclassed that round.

    So I don't see he bias
     
  2. mick557

    mick557 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,578
    5
    Nov 4, 2008
    :huh

    What are you arguing about I had it 8-4 for Floyd as well.

    Bob Sheridan who I was saying was biased was doing commentary he wasn't one of the judges.
     
  3. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Off of my last post it bring me to this one.......vs Cotto, Mayweather decided he's going to throw past 3 punches in a round. What happens?

    When you open up like that, the opponent if he's pretty good, gets his chance to land his.

    Now I ask? Why did Mayweather commit for to his shots and punch more in combination against Cotto than he did Marquez?????

    My answer is that Mayweather did'nt respect Cotto's ability to counter him, thus he felt more secure opening up vs Cotto than he did against Marquez which countering and thinking ability Mayweather respects.
     
  4. antonio8904

    antonio8904 Atheist Full Member

    6,138
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
  5. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Definitely a "im still here" moment for Cotto. Mayweather probably thought he was breaking Cotto to and came out with his hands down. Cotto caught him wih that hook as if to say "get your gloves up son"


    Also why I think Cotto outboxing Floyd that round is a little overrated. Floyd was a wee bit cloudy that round
     
  6. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Well to sum it up I thought 2 of the judges were on the money. With 1 being a little biased. But not overwhelmingly so.
     
  7. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    119-110 Cotto
     
  8. EuroBot

    EuroBot Guest

    118-110 Mayweather
     
  9. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    I got called for everything after making this statement just after the bout. Good to see someone else agrees.
     
  10. JennaJisAhoe

    JennaJisAhoe New Member Full Member

    84
    0
    May 2, 2012
    I scored it 6 rounds to 4 for Cotto with 2 rounds even. one thing is for sure: Floyd didnt win this fight. and anybody who believes the biased, ridiculous commentary, doesnt care about the truth. Cotto won. Floyd knows it. I know it. Cotto knows it.
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    I said in my op that I would not argue with any decision. I do have a question though. Some of you who had close score cards. Said something about finding rounds to give to Cotto. My question is why? Just beacuse one guy is doing good dose not mean the other guy is doing better. If boxer A. is doing better in each round than Boxer B. Shouldn't Boxer A. Get the round, no matter how well Boxer B. Might have done?