What were technical flaws of these fighters

I agree it would be competitive but I believe Tyson would win and my opinion on this cannot be changed

 

Which is why your opinion is obviously biased and hence somewhat meaningless. I'm sadly old enough to have watch Ali, Foreman, Tyson and Lewis in their primes, and if I had to pick the outcome in a round robin, it would be Lewis, Ali, Foreman, Tyson, although the last two could be up for debate with respect to their ordering as even could the first two. But Ali or Lewis would likely be number one or two and Foreman, Tyson would likely be numbers 3 or 4.

 

No my opinion is not meaningless. I've watched all of the boxers mentioned above and throughly ****ysed them and can say with full confidence that prime Tyson beats prime Ali. If you have a difference of opinion oh well that's life but there's no need to say immature things like my opinion is meaningless I am not alone in holding this opinion many boxing experts agree with my ****ysis and Muhammad Ali admitted that Tyson would probably beat him.

 

Go watch Ali vs Liston I.

 

Seen it hundreds of times great fight but please do not suggest Tyson is as slow as Liston or fights the same style

 

I know an opinion by a Tyson's friend who knows Tyson well.
By this opinion:
First fight:Ali can beat a nervous Tyson
Second fight:A Tyson win.

 

Tyson said Ali would beat him, also. It's called being modest.

If you think Tyson KOs Ali then your opinion is meaningless - and it's also not likely that Tyson would beat him on points either, because it's a fact that Tyson's speed, power & explosiveness faded in the late rounds.

 

So if I pick Ali to win my opinion means something but if I pick Tyson it's meaningless

That's not biased at all