What will be the main excuse for GGG defeat on Saturday?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by 22JM, Sep 12, 2017.


  1. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,264
    18,356
    Feb 4, 2012
    So to clarify you agree that physically Golovkin isn't in his prime? And that Canelo has had some very favourable scoring in the past?

    If the answer is yes - and make no mistake my cinnamon loving friend this is a yes or no question - then I take my sarcastic response to this thread back. Otherwise...
     
    KiwiMan and MVC! like this.
  2. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    78,003
    42,821
    Jan 22, 2015
    Canelo is no lemieux.. Get that fact straight.
     
    Pimp C and Sugar 88 like this.
  3. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    78,003
    42,821
    Jan 22, 2015
    I knew someone was going to use his amatuer record as to why hes old and shot, after Canelo beats him saturday night.
     
    IsaL likes this.
  4. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,262
    19,818
    Apr 26, 2006
    100
     
  5. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    78,003
    42,821
    Jan 22, 2015
    Why are you following me around bro? You trying to get famous? Lol
     
  6. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    78,003
    42,821
    Jan 22, 2015
    Does 100 represent the number of partners your mum had?
     
  7. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,262
    19,818
    Apr 26, 2006
    not funny....i would,t insult your mother...she did her best
     
  8. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    78,003
    42,821
    Jan 22, 2015
    100 times youve been bummed? Um confused
     
  9. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,262
    19,818
    Apr 26, 2006
    you know...think harder
     
  10. junkhead

    junkhead My dogs watch me post Full Member

    2,977
    2,183
    Mar 26, 2015
    Most of the people doing it don't want to admit that it's a good even fight and the only way they can concede Canelo is just as good as Golovkin is by making claims that if he wins it's because of X

    Edit: I'll put a caveat. I'm picking Golovkin to box from range and not really engage Canelo on the inside, to win a comfortable UD. But it's a pretty unpredictable fight honestly. Whoever imposes their style wins.
     
    Kush and IsaL like this.
  11. Paranoid Android

    Paranoid Android Manny Pacquiao — The Thurmanator banned Full Member

    7,393
    5,901
    Jul 21, 2017
    Would you favor a 35 year old Canelo tomorrow?

    Didn't think so.
     
    lefthandlead likes this.
  12. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    78,003
    42,821
    Jan 22, 2015
    Hell yeah..
     
  13. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,915
    Apr 14, 2009
    All GGG fans & impartial boxing fans want on Saturday is a Fair Fight, Well Contested, with 100 % honest officials & the better man on the night rightfully getting the win. The sad part is, as everyone knows, that is very unlikely to happen. Oscar,The NSAC. & Vegas boxing have already stacked the deck VERY unfairly in Canelo's favor. Oscars next step is to insist GGG fight blindfolded & one arm tied behind his back
    Seriously, far from saying the GGG fans are worried GGG cant beat Canelo Its the whole Canelo set up that have no confidence in their man in a fair fight against GGG that they have to stack the deck so high that GGG practically needs a miracle to get the win.
    But what they do not realize is !!! Gennady GGG Golovkin !!!
    is capable of performing miracles & will DESTROY Oscars red headed cherub On Sat night !!!!!!!!! WAR GGG !!!!!!!!!!
     
    lefthandlead likes this.
  14. oiky

    oiky Gypsy Boy Full Member

    4,723
    1,771
    Jan 17, 2014
    Obviously..

    Saying "like he did against Lemieux" in no way implies that I put Canelo and Lemieux on par with one another
     
  15. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    78,003
    42,821
    Jan 22, 2015
    It implies that GGG can do to Canelo what he did to lemieux which is bonkers, simply because they fight nothing alike.