What would have happened to boxing without WWII?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Feb 5, 2014.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    What would the history of boxing have looked like if the Nazis had come to a peaceful arrangement with Poland in 1939 and called it quits?

    I've always found this question interesting, since Germany was building itself into a boxing superpower before the War. The Nazi state treated sports like the Soviet Union later would: as a venue to show the superiority of its system over the democracies.

    But unlike the Soviet Union, the Nazis really, really obsessed over boxing. As early as 1936, they'd won a disproportionate share of the medals in the Berlin Olympics. Something about boxing seems to have appealed to them -- presumably the more violent and bullying aspects of the sport. The various Nazi youth organizations made boxing a centerpiece of their curricula, and there were a LOT of boxers coming up through the amateur ranks who died in WWII.

    I've especially wondered what would have happened to the heavyweight division if that generation had survived and grown up. Joe Louis would have had a lot more Nazis to flatten, I suppose.
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Lets remove any idea from the onset that Schmelling was a Nazi, he was actually a rebel of the Nazi regime, protecting Jews and not supporting the regime

    Louis himself likely doesn't get the same support from Americans. He was getting allot of racial abuse in the media prior to him being a spearhead of the whole WW2 against Schmelling (wrongly) fight. Then he became a symbol of America. Without that perhaps it becomes 'Our White boxer' against the 'Negro' type crowds you got with Jack Johnson.

    I'm not sure how good the German amateurs were but as Schmelling had shown, the smart money was in emigrating to America.
     
  3. BoxingX

    BoxingX Active Member Full Member

    1,186
    2
    Aug 17, 2013
    Interesting to think about!

    Had the war not happened, it's not any stretch to say you'd have had more European champions/contenders through the weight classes from the 40s on. I don't know of any German HWs other than Schmeling, but some would have arisen just in the effort to save face perhaps from the Louis KO1.

    But... without WW2...

    Some other huge military conflict would have definitely happened between the fascists, democracies and communists...

    Maybe in the nuclear age? :0
     
  4. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    A guy who protected Jews and basically a war hero. Schmeling was awesome.

    My point was that Louis thought he was a Nazi, which helped Louis's motivation enormously.

    That might have been true in the 20's and early 30's (and again after the War, really), but the Nazi state supported its favorite athletes and celebrities to the hilt.

    As far as German heavyweight amateurs go, Herbert Runge, Richard Grupe, and Hein ten Hoff would probably be the first off the production lines, so to speak. They'd be a lot better funded and supported in this scenario than they were historically. There might have been some other boxers in the Army who wouldn't die in WWII this time. Louis would still probably splatter them.

    The first generation of younger boxers -- guys who'd grown up in the Hitler Youth; the first true children of the Nazi regime -- would have come around in the late 40's or early 50's. Aging versions of Louis and Walcott, plus perhaps Marciano (if he starts boxing) and Charles would have their hands full.

    We might see the Germans grab the heavyweight title by the early 50's and keep it.
     
  5. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Incidentally, here's a bit of amateur footage of Herbert Runge from the 1936 Olympics. He came a bit before the Nazi state really tightened its hold on Germany; the system didn't "create" him in the same way that it would have created the next generation --

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbNCpcqenOg




    And here's footage of Hein ten Hoff against Jersey Joe Walcott. Hoff was already over 30 when he fought Walcott; a lot of his "prime" would have happened in the mid/late 40s if not for the War. He was a very hard puncher (though also a bit clumsy), and I suspect he was taller than his listed 6'3":

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AZJtdVKW4A

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTmNZZXLMng
     
  6. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    The Jeffries-Johnson thread wouldn't have been hi-jacked for one thing!
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Please Change the thread title to 'A Nazi Hitler Youth Boxing Programme instead of WW2'? :lol:

    There a few problems with this, such as how focused the Nazi's would be on boxing and if they could get the trainers. You need to have boxed to teach boxing. Without the trainers your not going to excel.

    Hoff wasn't that good and Runge looks good but very raw, carrying his chin too high.
     
  8. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    :lol:

    The Nazi issue is just the biggest change I could think of.

    Boxing in Europe and the States probably also changes a great deal because of the War. Britain and some other countries probably delay / never get a welfare state, which means more desperate young men for the grinder. Dunno what happens with Russia. They might have a good amateur program a generation earlier without all of the deaths. Boxing in the United States benefits from the lack of interruption from WWII (although a lot of young men won't start boxing in the army), but also "benefits" from reduced welfare legislation like the GI Bill. Again, fewer egalitarian programs mean more poor young guys. And the Depression lasts longer, so that "helps" too.

    Boxing in general would be in much better shape during the 1950s.

    We know that they were historically. I see no reason why it wouldn't continue.

    That's true. I think that Germany had its share of good boxing instructors, though.


    To be fair, Runge was an amateur here. Hoff suffered from the same issue that afflicted a lot of German boxers -- WWII and the postwar poverty screwed with his career big time. I don't think it's too far of a stretch to assume that he'd be better with Nazi support and more consistent training throughout.

    Though really, Runge and Hoff's successors would be the bigger issue. Whoever they'd be. Probably some kids who would have been killed in the Battle of Berlin in our history.
     
  9. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    A quick look at some facts. Here are the rated heavyweights from the Ring Magazine's yearly ratings for the 1930's

    White Americans (34)--Jack Sharkey, Ernie Schaaf, King Levinsky, Mickey Walker, Tommy Loughran, Young Stribling, Stanley Poreda, Tuffy Griffith, Max Baer, Johnny Risko, Patsy Perroni, Charley Massara, Steve Hamas, Lee Ramage, Art Lasky, Natie Brown, Charley Retzlaff, Eddie Mader, Hank Hankinson, Ray Impellitierre, Al Ettore, Ford Smith, Jimmy Braddock, Maxie Rosenbloom, Sonny Walker, Nathan Mann, Tony Galento, Jimmy Adamick, Lou Nova, Bob Pastor, Red Burman, Gus Dorazio, Johnny Paycheck, Lee Savold

    Black Americans (5)--Unknown Winston, Joe Louis, Leroy Haynes, Roscoe Toles, Jack Trammell

    British and Empire (5)--Don McCorkindale, Larry Gains, Jack Peterson, Tommy Farr, Len Harvey

    European (5)--Max Schmeling, Primo Carnera, Walter Neusel, Gunnar Barland, Andre Lenglet

    Latin American (2)--Arturo Godoy, Alberto Lovell
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Here are the totals from The Ring yearly ratings for the 1950's

    White Americans (13)--Lee Savold, Joey Maxim, Rex Layne, Lee Oma, Rocky Marciano, Roland LaStarza, Joe Baksi, Dan Bucceroni, Charley Norkus, Willie Pastrano, Roy Harris, Pat McMurtry, Mike DeJohn

    Black Americans (23)--Ezzard Charles, Joe Louis, Clarence Henry, Bob Baker, Jersey Joe Walcott, Bob Dunlap, Jimmy Bivins, Tommy Harrison, Bob Satterfield, Coley Wallace, Hurricane Jackson, Jimmy Slade, Archie Moore, John Holman, Johnny Summerlin, Young Jack Johnson, Harold Carter, Eddie Machen, Zora Folley, Wayne Bethea, Sonny Liston, Floyd Patterson, Billy Hunter

    British & Empire (7)--Jack Gardner, Johnny Williams, Earl Walls, Don ****ell, Henry Cooper, Brian London, Joe Erskine

    European (3)--Karol Sys, Heinz Neuhaus, Ingemar Johansson

    Latin American (3)--Cesar Brion, Nino Valdes, Alex Miteff
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Conclusion--The biggest change in the heavyweight division between the thirties and the fifties was the fall of the color line in America. It was happening before WWII, but WWII accelerated the process, and also accelerated immigration from the rural South to the northern industrial cities. There were jobs to be had in the war industries.

    The USA had 39 of the 51 rated heavyweights in the 1930's, and 36 of the 49 rated heavyweights in the 1950's. The British Empire and Europe produced 10 rated heavyweights between them in both the 1930's and the 1950's. Whether the war stopped something from happening which would otherwise have happened is open to speculation.

    **My bottom line would be that while Joe Louis is the single best heavyweight in either decade, the fifties were overall stronger than the thirties due to the massive influx of Black American talent.

    ***So what does this mean directly to the question posed. I think if there had been no war, the migration of rural Southern blacks to the North would have been much slower, and military service plays a role here also. I think there would not have been as many top black heavyweights in the fifties.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  10. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    Jimmy Bivins would've gotten that title shot, and given Joe Louis fits.
     
  11. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    An interesting historic twist, would this of been the case or would Labour have won and pushed it through anyway? Ofcourse Britain would be much richer as a country too without WW2. Does independence for the colonies get postponed?

    The US would still lead the way with boxing gym concentration and trainer quality. The big money commerce was in the US too, which is always the driver for boxing.

    I'm not sure of poverty necessarily feeding boxing. There is plenty of poverty in Africa and India but few boxers are produced from those regions. There was more boxing participation after the great depression during the recovery.
     
  12. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "I'm not sure of poverty necessarily feeding boxing."

    Too much poverty probably undercuts it. Big-time sports flourish in countries in which most have enough money to spend it on entertainment.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  13. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    I think it's like a bell curve. Too much poverty destroys the funding for boxing. Too little means that nobody will want to make their career in a violent sport that damages its competitors neurologically.

    So it makes sense that the most successful fighters often come from poor segments of rich countries. (Turks and Eastern Europeans in Germany, Jewish, Irish, and African Americans in the United States, etc.) US heavyweight boxing would have probably declined a lot earlier if the African American community had been less oppressed, for instance.
     
  14. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Now this is an interesting question. A lot of African countries' economies declined or collapsed post-independence. With the British Empire still around, you might see economic stability for a while longer -- and a thriving talent pool of Ugandan/Nigerian/etc. fighters.


    Nigeria has been producing good fighters for a while, at least.
     
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Before sports funding was cut it was producing quite a few but nothing like what it would if there was a big boxing scene there.