What would Y. Macks record be against calzaghes opponents?

How can Mack go 45-2, when Calzaghe was 46-0?

Second, Mario Veit in his prime was a force. Not only would Veit beat Mack, he would beat Froch and maybe Ward :bart

 

loses vs Hopkins, Jones, Kessler, Bika, Mkrtchyan, Woodhall, Reid, Eubank, Mitchell and maybe some of the others too

 

A force, or a farce?

 

There's no contradiction for a boxer being both.

I honestly think Andre Ward is a bit of a farce, for reasons I've pointed out, but he's no less a force because of that.

Some of the stoppages Joe Calzaghe scored was a farce. But was Joe a force? Yes, sir!

Mario Veit can therefor, in his prime, be a force and a farce.

 

He'd beat Mack without a doubt, but yeah, the guy must be Mario himself to say he'd beat Froch or Ward.:yep:yep

 

Mario Veit was a joke of the highest order, the ultimate expression of German padded record building marketed exclusively to the hugely gullible nationalistic Hun crowds for maximum profit.

of course, when the germans realise they have been cheated out of their money by being fed stiffs to watch for years, the shyts going to hit the fan. Eventually, it will dawn on them.

 

with a paid ref in wales, pretty easily for anyone.

(and if Mack was "welsh". Personally he sounds Scottish so it might be a hard sell for even Wassen to flog him with lies to the welsh.).

 

Lol at lose to Jones.

Jones was a shot punching bag during that period of time. He couldn't even take out a fat, desperate, shot Trinidad at Light Heavyweight.

I'm pretty confident Mack and any other top 10 LHW/Super Middleweight at the time could of beaten Jones.