What would you rather see: Floyd vs. Pac or Pac vs. JMM IV?

if pac fights JMM again it will look like pac is ducking floyd .......and if pac fights floyd *****s will say pac is ducking JMM , or he must prove himself worthy by beating JMM to face floyd....

 

pac/floyd!

 

So there is no point in a 4th fight... Unless it is to avoid an even more dangerous opponent. The point of prize fighting is prizes. To take this fight rather than face Mayweather, the ultimate prize, violates every point of being in the profession.

No. Actually, after this recent performance, calling his accomplishments of late anything other than a fraud/media fabrication makes you look disturbed. Improved power. Improved Boxing. Skilled opponents. Literally, it all proved false.

 

So full of it. Nobody wants to see that JMM fight. Nobody.

Pac sure doesn't want to see Mayweather though.

 

Who in the **** would say Pac is ducking JMM, seriously?

 

It doesn't violate anything when Marquez still deserves a fourth fight.

So I guess that also means Barrera, Cotto, Marquez, Morales, Mosley, Clottey, Hatton, DLH and many others are all a bunch of frauds. Why would Mayweather want to fight a fraud, he must be a fraud too then.

 

BS it doesn't. Boxing isn't about deserving anything. If that was the case Margo would have never been in a title eliminator at 154. Boxing is about money. This fight makes no sense. Especially if you view it through the lens of ruining Pac's negotiating position with Mayweather.

Get out of here. Barrera was schooled by Junior Jones, TWICE, and had 60 fights by the time he met Pac. Marquez obviously beat him. Morales by Raheem and Pac AS USUAL fought the loser. Hatton was ruined. DLH was a skeleton. Mosley couldn't beat Mora who lost on FNFs! Those men were all great at one time, but Pac makes sure he takes them on in SEVERE decline and/or of a SPECIFIC style type.

If Pac is who you say he is? Take the fight. JMM will be there.

 

If it wasn't about "deserving" then a third fight wasn't going to happen. Obviously the sport is about money, that's nothing new but different situations bring different fights. You can make a case that it should have been Pac/Mayweather rather than Pac vs Cotto/Clottey/Margarito/Mosley/Marquez, does that mean ALL of those fights made no sense?. If they made no sense you wouldn't be here hating on Pacquiao for having a close competitive fight in a fight that supposedly didn't make sense. I guess it only makes sense when the result isn't as expected, huh?

Schooled by Junior Jones? :rofl, then I guess Morales was also a fraud for fighting him? , lay off the cheap crack man. Going against Pacquiao Barrera was coming off wins over Morales, Hamed, Tapia, Kelley and Sanchez.

Morales was coming off a loss to Barrera in a tough close fight, yes Barrera who Pacquiao already beat. Obviously you're too self intoxicated to remember that it was supposed to be Marquez II rather than Morales but Marquez priced his self out. Then again here's another weird fact, Pacquiao, the fraud fought Morales who BEAT him!, a fraud fighting a competitive live opponent!, wow that's new. A rematch was necessary whether he lost to Raheem or not, Pacquiao still needed to avenge a loss, wake up.

Hatton was ruined yet MANY people picked him to brutalize Pacquiao. Even if that's not enough to you, of course it wouldn't, he was the lineal champion at 140 and undefeated at that weight.

DLH was a skeleton who went in as a heavy betting favorite to demolish Pacquiao in 3 rounds or less. :rofl

Marquez beat him on your unofficial somber scorecard. Still though, you admit there, at least, that he fought a tough opponent that "beat" him, right?. A fraud fighting someone that BEAT him, that's one hell of a strange fraud, let me tell you.

 

NEGATIVE YOUR OFF:deal

IF MARQUEZ WHOOPS ON PAC, KNOCKS EM, OR TAKES A CLOSE LOSS, THE MAYWEATHER PAC FIGHT MAY NOT HAPPEN:deal

UR WAY OFF BRO..NO LOGIC IN WHAT UR SAYING..

TAKE THE FLOYD FIGHT FIRST:deal...

THEN FIGHT JMM NEXT:deal

FLOYD FIGHT GETS "SMALLER" IF PAC LOSES OR GETS ANOTHER CLOSE DECISION...HELL JMM MAY KNOCK HIM IN THIS NEXT ONE.:deal

"JMM 4" IS ANOTHER EXCUSE FOR MANNY TO DUCK FLOYD LIKE HE HAS BEEN DOIN ALL ALONG.:deal

 

I wanna see Floyd - Marquez II.

I don't think JMM's head was in the last fight. He seems to be a better fighter now, both physically and mentally. I think it would be an interesting match.

It would also really insult & humiliate Pac, which I would LOVE to see at this point.

 

Pacquiao have no possibilities with Floyd.And I want to see Márquez beat his ass again, this time in México, this would be epic, imagine the Azteca Arena full packed with the loud, athmosphere...historic fight.Pac-Floyd had lost all the magic.

 

Fighter A fighting Fighter B says nothing about Fighter C. If you want Floyd to humiliate Pac, he'd only be able to do that inside the actual ring with him.

 

I really don't have a strong preference one way or the other, but I lean towards Marquez-Pacquiao IV. I'm confident Floyd outboxes Pacquiao to a lopsided decision win.

 

Theres no reason for the 4th fight. If JMM wins then what another 5th match? :rofl

Floyd/Pac even if Pac looses, theres always a 4th fight with Marquez.

 

Koman600 is an ATF