What year version of Larry Holmes had the best chance against Tyson?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by kolcade4, May 13, 2012.


  1. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,613
    2,509
    Nov 6, 2011
    I'll agree with the majority here and go around the 78-82 years for Larry. One specific year would probably be the end of 81. Still around 210-215 lbs, plenty of experience against world class opposition, and still in great physical shape.

    Whether he would actually beat Tyson is a whole different matter. Style wise it certainly favours Tyson, however Larrys jab could frustrate Tyson along with clinching fairly regularly and his heart was unquestionable. I think Holmes could win, but my money would certainly be on Tyson
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Holmes was a boxer with great punch variety and enough pop in his mits to get to Tyson, the same way Holyfield or Douglas did. Holmes' chin was on par with Holy's. I think he had even better speed, better smarts, and more stamina in comparison to Holyfield and Douglas.

    Essentially Holmes had the right style to beat Tyson. Tyson is a dangerous front runner, but after he got hit a bit, or the rounds rolled on, he lost steam, will and poise.

    I would pick the 1978-1982 Holmes over the 1986-1987 Tyson.
     
  3. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    I'd bet on this version of Holmes to outpoint Mike over 12 rounds. Don't know if Holmes could stop Tyson inside the distance, but I wouldn't put it past this version of him.
     
  4. El-Mafioso

    El-Mafioso Member Full Member

    156
    0
    May 11, 2012
    Prime Tyson beat a prime Larry by UD
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,194
    25,475
    Jan 3, 2007
    Homes looked pretty brilliant in 1980. He was a more seasoned champion than the one who faced Norton, Shavers and Weaver, yet still possessing the speed, stamina and workrate of a younger man. Additionally this was his most active time as a champion. He defended 4 times in 1980, and 3 times in both the previous and following years. He was busy, and opperating like a well oiled machine. I'm still not 100% sold on the idea of even this version of Holmes taking Tyson, but showing up in his 1980 form would likely be his best bet.
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,194
    25,475
    Jan 3, 2007

    The Tucker bout is evidence of nothing. Tony Tucker was a totally dissimilar boxer than Holmes and one who often fought to survive rather than taking any chances to get a leg up on his better foes. At 6'5", 225 lbs, he had a tremendous size advantage over Mike, even greater than the one a prime Holmes would have, and couldn't win more than three rounds. Not saying Holmes couldn't beat Tyson prime for prime, but the Tucker bout gives us no gauge as to weather or not it would happen.
     
  7. tommy the hat

    tommy the hat Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    9
    Sep 2, 2008
  8. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    :good
     
  9. No Fear

    No Fear Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,973
    0
    Sep 6, 2008
    Are they fighting in a vacuum or is there a possibility that any version of Holmes would have been intimidated by Tyson's reputation, meaning that Prime Tyson beats Prime Holmes, 10/10?
     
  10. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,199
    8,720
    Jul 17, 2009
    Holmes did n't seem to be the type who got intimidated. Only in his fight in real time with Tyson. That's only because he knew that he was being a twat for meeting Tyson at that point,and being totally unprepared for it.
     
  11. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    THe 1981-1982 version of Larry takes Mike in a grueling fight.
     
  12. Vockerman

    Vockerman LightJunior SuperFlyweigt Full Member

    908
    85
    May 18, 2006
    This year's version of Larry against this year's version of Mike :)
     
  13. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,230
    1,643
    Sep 13, 2006
    Larry was at his best from 79 to 82. He was still really good after that, but I think his discipline and motivation dipped a bit. He was still the best heavyweight in the world, but not quite as sharp. So, any version of Holmes during that time period would do. Doesn't matter what year, because prime Holmes gets into fantastic shape for a Tyson type fighter and would give it his last breath to win. And he'd do whatever it took to win - fight, run, grab, duke it out, stink it out, regardless, he'd find a way.
     
  14. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Holmes beween 1979 and 1982 was peak....... Holmes who beat the **** outta "Shavers, LeDoux, Berbick and Cooney" was right in mind and body...... The Jan. '88 Holmes was in okay shape for a dude age 38, but also rusty as a door nail in a haunted house.....
    :deal

    SR.BILL:hat
     
  15. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    O'...this fight. Yeah. I saw this one time too. I remember seeing a 5'11 fighter with a short reach land Jabs on a 6'5 fighter with a long reach. I remember seeing this much bigger man tie up this small man because he feared getting tagged. I remember this much smaller man "struggled" :roll: while winning UD. I guess if you don't knock them dead, you "struggle" your way to a UD. Most of the rest win a UD...brilliant. Tyson...exposed.