What year was ODLH prime???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PJ, Jan 3, 2008.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,686
    13,497
    Jan 6, 2007
    He only has ONE clear loss to the much bigger Bernard.

    (Sorta like if Floyd was to fight Pavlik)

    The first Mosley fight was a CLOSE split decision.
    The second Mosley fight was probably a gift.

    He cleary 'beat' Tito.
    And he fought a close SD with Floyd.




    Against that, the SweetPea fight could have gone either way.
    The Quartey fight was very close,
    and the Sturm fight was probably a gift.
     
  2. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    1996 -> 2000.
     
  3. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    IMO he beat:
    Trinidad
    Mosley II
    Whitaker
    Quartey

    Lost to:
    Hopkins (Duh)
    Mosley 1 (obvious)
    Sturm
    Floyd

    He fought a great fight against Mosley, though it probably wasn't the right fight. Mosley clearly won the fight. Boxing rather than fighting worked much better in the second fight, which I thought was a close win for Oscar.
     
  4. KhanB

    KhanB Active Member Full Member

    819
    0
    Oct 18, 2006
    The Sturm fight was probably a gift??
    You think HBO didnt have a financial interest in
    DLH/ Hopkins that a Sturm win would stop?
    And you believe that the FIRST Mosley fight
    wasnt a clear win?
    I think you wear Goldie glasses which twists your
    vision and reality when it comes to Oscar but thats
    just me.
     
  5. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Cuchulain has never been a DLH lover. He fairly gave an opinion on some awfully close fights.
     
  6. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    The Quartey fight was very close. I agree.

    I scored the fight against Whitaker as a draw. I have also scored it for De la Hoya and for Whitaker. It was close.

    I think he defeated Tito clearly. Not only that, he SCHOOLED Tito in the first 9 rounds.

    The first fight against Mosley was close and competitive. Mosley won. No objection. I haven't seen the second fight, but it was probably also close. Ok, this are real loses.

    The fight against Sturm was won by Sturm.

    The fight against the much bigger Bernard was obviously a pretty clear Bernard victory.

    The fight against Money Mayweather was close and competitive but I think Mayweather should've won by UD.

    So he defeated: Whitaker, Quartey, Tito

    And he lost against: Mosley x2, Hopkins, Sturm, Mayweather
     
  7. Steel Kelly

    Steel Kelly Active Member Full Member

    532
    1
    Jan 2, 2008
    1997-2000 from Whitaker to Mosley 1
    If there was one year to pick then it's 1999 despite the Trinidad judging fiasco.
     
  8. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    Prior to ever fighting at WW.
     
  9. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    4,663
    5
    May 1, 2005
    He was at his prime in 2002 when he beat Vargas. After that he was not active enough.
     
  10. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    100
    Nov 8, 2004
    I'm sure you'd agree his prime continued into his welterweight days, but his absolute peak was before his welter days, at 140. He didn't have many fights there but I think that's the division in which he'd be hardest to beat. He had a decent amount of experience by then and was extremely sharp.
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,686
    13,497
    Jan 6, 2007
    Thanks Kg.

    IMO, he has had a reasonably good run with the best resume of opponents of anyone currently active.

    At times, he's gotten questionable breaks, but he's paid for that with some poor decisions against him.

    He was at his best at the lighter weights (as Floyd and Shane were) and I think his prime was 1998-2000.
     
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,686
    13,497
    Jan 6, 2007

    I see your point to a degree.

    As I've mentioned, his best performances came at the lowere wts.
     
  13. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    Agreed. I place him higher there not because he himself was more skilled, but because he wasn't facing the bigger, better competition at WW. Anyone would've had a very tough time with Oscar at LWW.
     
  14. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,315
    299
    Jul 23, 2004
    De La Hoya was only 23 years old when he fought at LWW, probably the begining of his best days. His prime started around 96 when he battered an ageing Chavez inside 4 rounds.

    If your saying his prime was prior to entering the WW division, then his prime must have been extremely short lived. Exactly a year to be precise. Because no way were his best fighting days at LW. He wasn't anywhere near fully seasoned and developed at lightweight, although his power there was maybe at its best.

    De La Hoya's was at his peak both physically combined with ability at WW, with his power understandably not quite what it was two divisions south.

    IMO LWW-WW. 96-2000.
     
  15. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    100
    Nov 8, 2004
    96-200 is about right, but DLH held the greatest advantages under welterweight because although Oscar got bigger and stronger there, bona fide 147 pound fighters are also a LOT bigger and stronger there than are 140 fighters.

    To me its the same as it is for Tommy Hearns. Hearns did get stronger at 154, but considering the height-reach-power advantage he had over 147 pounders compared to 154 pounders, his prime was at 147.