What you can't take away from calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HEADBANGER, Oct 22, 2009.


  1. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    44
    Jun 28, 2007
    I think Calzaghe's a ****, but he was an entertaining fighter. He could have done a lot more, but as is he's still the best 168 pounder of all time. I thought he lost to Hopkins, though.
     
  2. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    I think cotto does. Infact he really showed it in the 2nd half of the Clottey fight when his eye was cut in he was in deep waters.
     
  3. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    He didnt do it too well against Margarito, loaded gloves or no Loaded gloves, he was very one dimensional in that fight.

    Calzaghe was just an out and out warrior, one of the most hair raising, goosebump inducing moments i rememebr is his fight against Byron Mitchell, Knocked down, he decided to trade with the bigger punching Byron, and beat the crap out of him!
     
  4. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,588
    Jan 22, 2009
    Calzaghe's a great fighter and deserves all the props in the world for being one-especially due to his victory over a very good Kessler.But please stop giving him credit for beating a seriously shot Jones that couldn't even ko even more seriously shot former welterweight Tito Trinidad in the fight before the Calzaghe fight.
     
  5. El Borracho

    El Borracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,053
    0
    Jun 22, 2008
    He's an ATG IMO. Could have made more big fights happen when in his prime, but you could say the same of almost anyone