whats a better test???????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by anut, Oct 19, 2008.


  1. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    whats a better test for 1st heavyweight fight........tillis vs holyfield.....or barrettt against haye......????:smoke:smoke:smoke
     
  2. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Both were old, probably Barrett since tillis was 41, but Tillis was alot better than Barrett in his younger days. Both safe fights but then again tillis wasn't ranked as high as Barrett so Barrett the better fight, Haye is gonna blast him out quick.
     
  3. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Holyfield had six fights before getting Buster Douglas.
    Haye is looking in from outside, trying to get there with only one or two fights.


    Haye ought to have a bit more respect.
     
  4. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Needless to say, I am a fan of Haye.

    He's pure excitement, what the division needs.
     
  5. Uppercut83

    Uppercut83 The Quitschkos are bums Full Member

    4,209
    1
    Jun 28, 2008
    Haye is taking on a much tougher challenge.
     
  6. CrazyMac

    CrazyMac Nearly ExArmy Full Member

    415
    3
    Apr 3, 2007
    Going for the most respected HW after only one fight takes balls. The Barret fight is only to give Haye the smallest piece of respect needed to make the fight with Klit a possiblity.
    Some may say its for the money but i think its for the glory.
     
  7. aceshigh

    aceshigh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,356
    0
    Jan 6, 2007
    Holyfield would have probably fought Tyson his 1st heavyweight fight if it was offered to him. I can't see him turning it down.