whats is this cheating warren refs

Exactly.

Without Sir Frank, Scotland wouldnt have a world champion just now. He aint perfect, but I love him anyway for getting Burns the Martinez fight, I will forever be in his debt as a scottish boxing fan.

 

Threads like this (and other comments made tonight) make you wonder about that Maloney comment in Boxing Monthly about "insiders" having anonymous forum accounts and using them to have a go at competitors....:think

Warren has his faults but he put on a great nights boxing tonight with no major controversies or even the hint of any corruption yet people still manage to find a problem.

 

The doctor forced one stoppage, a trainer the other and Dilks never complained.
Please tell me that this is a comedy thread.
Also, in the last fight of the night the ref gave the decision to the Iraqi against one of Warren's fighters!



Adios.

 

Is the same every ****ing week. Amateur conspiracy theorists who think that crying "corruption" after every fight somehow makes them seem worldly wise and "in the know" about boxing.

 

Dave Parris caused the Wall Street Crash and the Credit Crunch, didn't you know?

Mr V.I.P speaks the truth at all times

 

Do you think Khan (or Enzo last night) looked in any way fit to continue after their first knockdowns? but the refs are very reluctant to stop the fight and gave them another go to survive, regardless of their health as an individual, their first instinct is to protecting Warrens investments/records.

I applaud Warren for the show last night, it was great enetretainment and far better value than some of the other muck i've paid for. However, nobody would be able to convince me that referees do not give Waren fighters the benefit of the doubt.

Why did we not see a close up of Jennings cut?>

 

I swear I saw him put something in his mouth and then smear blood above his eye as the ref walked him back into his corner.

 

nah, dom ingle sprinkled some substance on brooks tape and whispered "cut him up".

warren looked on and smiled.

 

How is this thread still here?

 

wich fighter was that, ive looked on news sites, no mention of it.:huh

 

Don Broadhurst, I think.

 

dunno where warren gets the refs but surely to god he briefs them before the fight ,like if my fighter is down long long count , if my fighter is on top jump in and wave it off this as been going on for years ,one of the main reason i dislike warren

 

In what way does allowing Khan to take a further beating protect Warrens investment?, if anything it lowers its value

 

The only time Khan ever got a favour was against Limond.

Has anyone thought that it might be national bias that would encourage a ref to act in a particular manner..... rather than being in somebodies back pocket.

 

Brian huges knew micheal didnt have the tools to beat brook' So he saved him from the inevitable' well done bri.