what's really the "fuzz" about jmm if pac was his only claim for fame?

i'm a fan of pacman and jmm, who imo is the best pure boxer at the moment. the lack of strength in jmm's resume compared to the other big 4 (pac, morales, barrera) is not indicative of the man's excellence in the ring. being high risk/low reward it was difficult for him to secure high profile fights with mab and morales. Hamed also shamelessly ducked jmm for years while he was his mandatory.

 

Torres sucks as an interpreter, he misses many things the fighters say and makes stuff up out of thin air and puts it in the boxer's mouth.

 

exactly, I believe Manny Steward admitted in public that he didnt want Hamed to get in the ring with JMM. Smart business decision but blatant ducking.

 

I dont get the logic of some pac fans who put down fighters that pac will be fighting and then get surprised when people are not giving pac the "credit" he should get for fighting that fighter. if your a true pac fan you should confident in your boy and just let the haters talk, let the fight prove them wrong. If your ganna bash and call JMM a "nobody" then Pac should get no Credit for fighting a "Nobody"

 

what the "buzz"

 

I would'nt want to ride JMM's resume anyway, I'm just not that type of guy......

......is that what you do with Manny Pac's resume Johnco, you ride it???

Hey, to each his own I guess.:yep

 

boy I'm hoping jmm schools pac's ass so this huggers can STFU

 

Brother you aint never lied:amen