it means he challenged himself and not doing everything to protect that "0" including not playing on level playing field, cherrypicking, and "playing safe" mentality when fighting. no one is unbeatable while dominating, there will always be an off night and someone not suited for your style whether elite or not.
so do you think you should lose on purpose in order to become a better fighter? Interesting point :think
Two fighters have LEGITIMATELY beaten Mayweather but Vegas/NSAC corruption made sure they didn't get the deserved winning decisions. Having losses on your record simply means you have taken on all comers not cherry picked opponents & even then having the commission looking after you
:|:|:| 118-110 Yet when he supposedly faced his real challenge, Excusequiao got schooled. The only one who avoided anything was Excusequiao FIVE YEARS AGO, "giving blood weakens me." :deal
So floyd lost twice according to you and then came back and won in rematches? So that means he HAS faced oppostion and overcame. am I right?
he has fought form poverty at the age of 15 to the pro ranks. Has trained and been punched in the face for years. but yeah blood weakens him. The logic is so tight
Absolute unadulterated Bull Feces !!!! Mayweather ... Cossetted & protected throughout his career. Never taking a chance In recent years the REAL reason he has that bogus 0 still is the protection Vegas/Nsac have provided him. He legitimately lost to both Castillo & Maidana but Vegas judges made sure he kept his 0. Heck he even:|:| about his loss in the Olympics when he legitimately had his butt kicked. Pacquaio... While Mayweather was :|about his Olympic loss Manny ,as a teenager , was fighting pro . He had to to survive. He was fighting grown men & experienced fighters as a 15-17 year old KID. Sure he had losses that was inevitable. He came up the hard way had to FIGHT!! for everything he has. He proved himself in the Ledwaba fight coming in as a last minute sacrificial lamb but defying the odds & defeating Ledwaba. He hasn't really looked back since. Manny Pacquaio ,an 8 division world champion, was rightfully voted fighter of the decade & of his era. Pacquaio will ALWAYS be regarded as #1. The fight on May 2 proved nothing to me other than the blatant corruption of Mayweather/Vegas/ NSAC was proven without a shadow of a doubt. Mayweathers very tainted "win" proved nothing else Pacquaio >>>>>>>>> Mayweather & it ant even close :hi:
That all you got ??? I guess you cannot argue with anything I posted as its 100% true Manny Pacquaio.............. Fighter of the decade & fighter of the era Floyd Joy Sinclair Maywearher jr.... A woman beating cowardly fraud who throughout his career NEVER gave any opponent a level playing field Every unbiased Boxing fan KNOWS this If Mayweather has anything in that6 ******* of his he'll head to London or Dallas Tx to fight Amir Khan on a level playing field in a FAIR fight just for once. But sadly even you know that ******* is empty & the coward wouldn't do it. A leopard cannot change its spots ROFLMAO Now Ive finished talking about that spineless coward Mayweather he's nothing but a boil on the butt of boxing :hi::hi:
:|:|:| FOTD when he didn't fight Floyd. FACT! Too bad those awards didn't mean anything when they fought. Paper awards don't mean anything in the ring! :rofl:rofl:rofl
He won the rematch against Castillo I agree BUT Kenny Bayless was the reason Mayweather got the decision in the rematch. against Maidana. Kenny stopped Maidana " roughing him up & bullying him" by taking away any chance he had The world saw that It was blatant