What's stopping "old school" coaches from taking over boxing?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Dec 3, 2021.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    I think you'd be on pretty difficult ground arguing that Archie Moore DKSAB. It would be perhaps a stronger argument to say that the disconnect happened gradually, with fewer and fewer links, as time went on, to what made the 1930s "golden age" so strong.

    It's like going bald. There isn't one hair that falls out and suddenly makes you bald. It's a gradual process.
     
  2. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    Both were probably going on. Forgetting/losing information (unavoidable and common), and inventing new ideas (although this is less common as one ages past a certain point.)

    The end result is probably that boxing might be missing stuff it had in the 30s. Unless it was independently reinvented. And it probably has some new stuff, too. At least if you're talking about complicated approaches.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,099
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yes. And I'm of the opinion that humans tend to refine and invent more than they forget concerning things they apply themselves to.
     
  4. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    Tend? In general, yes.

    Part of Silver's claim is that fewer people were applying themselves to boxing, and when they did so, it was less rigorous than their forebears. Combine that with mostly oral transmission of knowledge, and his case becomes more plausible.
     
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Some of us have been pondering this for years. I've long hoped that some of the classisist folks on this forum would band together, open up a gym, and use their superior understanding of "the lost arts of boxing" to put modern trainers and their fighters to shame.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,099
    Jan 4, 2008
    More money and fewer people applying themselves and with less rigour? I don't see the connection.

    I think Futch, Arcel et al certainly applied themselves with rigour, as well as those (Benton to Roach) coming after them.
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2021
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    Silver argues that a variety of things changed boxing's talent pool by collectively burning out most of the market for low and intermediate level professional fights that traditionally taught boxers their craft. Additionally, he believes that the former interleaved network of geographically contiguous gyms has thinned out from the critical mass it achieved by the 30s, with negative effects on the way boxers are developed. Plus some other things.

    The rigor comment has to do with fighters more than trainers.

    Silver wouldn't dispute that Roach, Futch, Arcel, etc. are good coaches. His claim is that people like that were once much more common than they are now. You can't build a sport on the backs of a few good coaches.

    (I think he believes that the old timers had many better coaches than Roach, but that is a separate issue.)
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    There are not actual literally "lost" arts.
    It is just that fighters from old eras refined their craft more so through experience and seasoning, through competition.

    Some modern fighters are revered for using skills and techniques that were more commonplace among old-timers. That is all. It is not that some very secret esoteric knowledge has been lost, like some mythical ancient mystery .... just that the refined skill levels (ie. the application of skills and craft in high level competition)
    that most top fighters displayed in the past are now much more rarely seen.
     
    cross_trainer and Bukkake like this.
  9. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    What does Silver know about coaches outside the US? Just because Americans are no longer the all-dominant force when it comes to producing world class boxers, doesn't mean that there no longer are great trainers.

    Some years ago Golovkin was an exceptional fighter - as was Lomachenko. Today Usyk and (especially) Inoue look pretty good (at least to me). I know as little about their coaches as Silver does... but my guess is, that they probably know, what they are doing!
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,099
    Jan 4, 2008

    The pro marker burning out because more money was coming into it?

    And the amateur scene was really coming to live in the post war period and the scene also widened from mostly being about the US with a lot of talent starting to come through from Latin America and later on Post-Soviet and Eastern Europe as well as Asia and, to some extent, Africa. More money, a widened amateur scene and more potential practitioners. So I don't see any withering of talent.

    Not in theory and not on film. I'll leave it at that.
     
    Bukkake likes this.
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    No. Silver believes that the lower and middle rungs of the pro market burned out. The upper echelon is still super well paid.
     
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,656
    17,713
    Apr 3, 2012
    A lot of those guys become professional sparring partners.
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2021
    cross_trainer and mrkoolkevin like this.
  13. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    They did back then, too. But I assume it isn't a good thing to have one avenue disappear.
     
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,656
    17,713
    Apr 3, 2012
    You’ve got guys like Malik Scott who gave up his prime years to spar and Nate Tubbs who is pretty much unknown outside of beating Sanders bc he was on Tyson’s payroll.

    If there were guys like that decades ago, I’d like to know who.

    I also imagine there are jobs as personal trainers that weren’t around back then.
     
  15. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    Jimmy Young, probably.

    There have always been paid sparring partners. Are you saying that the option of becoming one wasn't open? I could buy that more are switching to full time sparring out of economic necessity, and that it was rarer back then to make a sole career of it, sure.
     
    NoNeck likes this.