Whats the difference between MW's ducking GGG and super bantams ducking Rigondeaux?

All I hear is so and so ducked GGG, pricing themselves out, holding the belt hostage. The same happened to Rigo and nothing is said about it.

Strum, Quillin, Jacobs, Saunders, Cotto and Canelo all ducked Golovkin and there is a thread abut it every ****ing day here.

Quigg, Santa Cruz, Martinez, Frampton, Mares and every Mexican alive has ducked Rigondeaux and never a peep.

Is there a difference between the 2 besides weight. A duck is a duck and it should all be abolished but there seems to be an underlying tone when comparing how the situations are handled between the 2 fighters.

People say Rigo should move up if no one will fight him. Agreed!:good

People say GGG should move up if no one will fight him. Pure Pandemonium !:|

Whats the difference? They both want to unify their divisions.

 

No one should move if they have a goal. If they want to take a money fight so be it, but Networks and sanctioning bodies are bias too. The WBC would never make Santa Cruz fight Rigo and the same should be considered about Canelo fighting Golovkin.

WBA and WBO stripped Rigo for his belts because guys would not fight him.

Will the WBA and IBF strip GGG if guys don't fight him either?

 

I didn't mean it like I agreed with it. I meant it like the casual and some hardcore boxing fans believed this should have been the case. They wanted him to move up to featherweight and fight Lomachenko and Walters. On the otherside some called for GGG to fight Ward and all hell broke loose.

 

GGG is the draw after WBC hostage takers Cotto and Canelo. He made the division HOT. I talk smack but who was talking about 160 before Golovkin?

The only concern from 135-154 was Floyd Mayweather and whoever he stood around. GGG made 160 a big division again. Rigondeaux is not exempt from total blame because he chooses to have the ****test management team on the planet.

I bet Haymon would have gotten him a fight with one of those guys.

 

Maybe, but does that matter? Should we be bias in who is more exciting?

Mayweather has always outsold Pacquiao in the PPV war, yet Manny is a more exciting fighter to watch. People still bought millions more of Mayweather PPVs and people claim that he is not exciting to watch.

Crawford is more exciting to watch than Adrien Broner, yet Broners viewership towers over Crawford and Golovkins when we talk numbers.

That should never be an excuse because there is always someone else that can outsell you.

Every event that Broner has been in since the Malinaggi fight has sold out completely. There are still tickets left to see GGG vs Wade. Hundreds of tickets.