What's the purpose of Floyd asking a rematch clause with Mosley?

I think it has something to do with this.

This content is protected

 

Then he should of never signed the contract.

It's part of boxing, been part of boxing for quite some time.

Why the fuss now about it because Mayweather requested it against Mosley?

He's requested it in a lot of his matches. Why no problem with it then?

 

If he loses to Mosley.

How could he get the Pac fight?


Do you think before you post?

 

This is standard for almost all fighters who have the upper hand in negotiations. Ali had one for frazier, Oscar for Shane- it ALWAYS goes on. its just common practise so that if the bigger name fighter loses- he has a chance to win it back- normally the bigger name has the belt- but in this case- its the other way around- the challenger has the clause. but still floyd is the clearly bigger name.

EVERY champ has had one in our sport- but when Floyd does it- somehow its a matter of fear or pride or some other mortal sin. you guys a so bias and blinded by this crap i dont know how you can seriously call yourselves "boxing fans"- just call yourselves "boxer fans" (there is big a difference ) and get it out in the open.

 

your post is correct with one small flaw. floyd is not the champion, he is the challenger.

 

After everyone is through here Join me in my new poll thread "Why did Floyd insist on being paid to fight Mosley"

 

I was going to ask why Pac would want to fight a guy coming off a loss, but we all know his history of fighting guys coming off a loss.

 

Are you ****in serious? Oscar didn't need a rematch clause. Floyd practically begged for a rematch despite winning. He only retired after he felt he wasn't getting enough money for the rematch.

 

stop trolling, people already answered your question

 

That still doesn't make sense.

Why would Pac fight Floyd if Floyd lost to Mosley?

Fighting Floyd while he's coming off a loss.

atsch