What's the worst thing.....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Smazz20, Jul 29, 2007.


  1. Cookie

    Cookie Active Member Full Member

    510
    0
    Feb 10, 2005
    **** PPVs are the most annoying thing for me. I never actually pay for boxing but it still bugs me. I get it all free one way or another. If I couldn't do that then I probably either wouldn't watch the sport or I certainly wouldn't be as into it as I am. What fans are made to pay is rarely actually worth the product being put out. I can't imagine paying $50 for a piece of nonsense like Hopkins-Wright.
     
  2. chewy 22

    chewy 22 Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Jul 5, 2007
    the europeans, and even the world, should stop blaming america for the worlds problems. even when it comes to boxing :lol:
     
  3. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Do you realise how many world champions you have left -questionmark- You only used to dominated the sport 50 years ago because you deported any foreign boxers percieved as a threat back in those days -fullstop-
     
  4. chewy 22

    chewy 22 Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Jul 5, 2007
    im european, btw.
     
  5. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    take your time...China_hand_Joe!
     
  6. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    :lol: ... wait, you're serious? :huh
     
  7. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    It doesn't matter how long this anti-European thing has been about, it is bad for boxing -fullstop-
     
  8. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    it does matter...because without it...there might not have been boxing in the way we think about it...
     
  9. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    The worst thing for boxing is the multiple sanctioning bodies.
    Shitty decisions don't help either.
     
  10. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Whatever gave you that idea -questionmark- Read this article Mr American - http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=11861&more=1

    That article is against Hatton - Floyd even happening -fullstop-

    It critisises Hatton for fighting a tougher fighter (Floyd) for less money when he could fight the easier Oscar, for double the money -fullstop- I don't know whether you are included in the group, but a lot of Americans buy into that and want to see Mayweather - Forrest instead -fullstop-
     
  11. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    I am surprised you like pro boxing more than amateur boxing...for multiple reasons.
     
  12. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Amature boxers are talentless compared to the top pros - why do I want to watch rubbish -questionmark- You can enjoy performanced like Lacy vs Veit, without caring for the politics of the sport -fullstop-
     
  13. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    Mr. American? Well, well, you obviously are prime example of ignorance. :good
    Plus, you're talking like people are agreeing with you.

    Let it be noted that I hope Hatton beats Mayweather. Oh wait, am I racist now? :patsch
     
  14. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    I really don't understand this blaming American media thing. Let's assume you are entirely right. So why doesn't the rest of the world raise top boxers who compete against each other without anyone at all giving two hoots about what goes on in the US...kind of like with football and rugby? Why is the American media to blame for that, assuming it has the power and inclination you remonstrate?
     
  15. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    You have chosen to ignore the negativity of that article completely, in what way can an article like that be a good thing whilst casuals who know no better are reading and believing it -questionmark-