Whats with all these shitty vacant title fights

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KO KIDD, Nov 27, 2011.


  1. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,186
    5,770
    Oct 5, 2009
    Vacant titles are supposed to be fought by the 1 and 2

    yet you will see the 1 fight like the 10 for a vacant belt almost like the sanctioning body just wants to spoon feed the belt to a known guy

    like when Alvarez fought Hatton for the vacant belt it was not the 1 and 2

    or when Berto fought that chump

    or last night when Broner fought a guy that could not have been top 5

    Vacant titles are losing legitimacy they wouldnt be so labeled as paper belts if the 1 and 2 were the ones going at it
     
  2. vipers

    vipers Guest

    The guy that Broner fought was ranked six

    and dont be stupid ***** Berto fought Zaveck who was ibf champ you dumbass.
     
  3. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,186
    5,770
    Oct 5, 2009
    whoa whoa whoa i was talking about Berto's WBC title when he fought that Rodriguez guy

    and Broners guy was ranked 6 why couldnt Broner fight the 2-5
     
  4. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    Yeah, theres no shortage of titles.