What's with the Klitschko's and these rediculous contracts?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by osreyes77, Dec 10, 2010.


  1. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    No, but I'm not talking about some fighters. I'm talking about David Haye. 50% upside on up to three fights against two of the biggest draws in the sport should be a dream come true. He's getting greedy because he can sell a boatload of PPVs in the UK, and he wants to keep that money for himself, while the Klitschkos get a flat fee for each fight on RTL (I feel like I saw 8 million Euro per fight reported somewhere, but I could be wrong). Of course, that ignores the fact that the Klitschkos would get a MUCH larger live gate than Haye could ever get, even if they're fighting the Sosnowskis of the world.

    And even Chisora said he would make a lot more money on the second and third fights, had he beaten Wlad. But for a purse 4x your career high payday, you take that risk. It's not like there are other big money options out there. Haye is giving his opponents **** contracts too.
     
  2. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Whether or not that's the case, what has repeatedly been reported (by Chisora, by Booth, by Chagaev and others) is that their standard contract is for three fights, where if you win you need to face the other brother, and if you win that one you rematch the original brother.

    Even if it is options, who else would they have them fight? Ustinov? Get real.
     
  3. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    It is fact! It was reported from various reliable sources, unaffiliated with each other. Open your eyes Hayelord!
     
  4. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,133
    10,552
    Jul 28, 2009

    One: You've misspelled ridiculous and absurd. Which is both ridiculous and absurd.

    Two: Chisora wasn't a mandatory, he didn't earn a shot at Wladimir in any way at all. Who cares what deal he was willing to take to get a fight he didn't earn? Both Klitschkos have kept up with their mandatory opponents and have their belts and demand whatever the hell they want. Big whoop. Guys on top dictate tough terms and get what they want. That never changes much.
     
  5. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    This is not a bad deal for somebody who has zero chance of becoming a mandatory anytime soon. They can fight for a mandatory shot or they can sell themselves into slavery to get one. Personal choice, really.

    Haye got into slave contract with Don King to get a shot at Valuev. He did not want to fight Chagaev to become a mandatory. It tells something about the man, doesn't it?
     
  6. Daddy Warbucks

    Daddy Warbucks Member Full Member

    212
    0
    Nov 29, 2010
    I don't think it's ridiculous at all. Chisora is lucky as **** to even get a shot at the champion. Plus, if he did beat Wlad, the best fight out there would be Chisora vs Vitali. Who would you want him to fight instead? Harrison? Ruiz? Valuev? It's reasonable and it makes for the best scenario for fans.
     
  7. BeaverDan

    BeaverDan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,834
    108
    Jul 23, 2007
    Aren't you the fool that made himself look stupid on that other thread with the boxing odds? :patsch Soon dissapeared from there, didn't you :lol: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=273677

    I am no Haye lord. Infact I was only saying recently how I wished they would just fight so I could laugh at the losing crowd, whoever get's KO'd.

    But there is no doubting you're a Klit-sucker.

    EDIT: Yeah, it was you. Thought so.
     
  8. uraharakisuke

    uraharakisuke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,518
    0
    Jan 10, 2010
    The point is if he beat Wlad it should be up to him who he fights next. The people defending this are the same people who defend everything the Kilts do.
     
  9. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    What's the problem? Most word champions put rematch clauses into contracts and nobody complains, so why the complaint about having to rematch with Wlad? And the fight with Vitali in between, why wouldn't he want that anyway? Why would you beat one brother and not want to fight the other? Haye has already said he wants to fight Wlad then Vitali, so what's the problem?
     
  10. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    But he's already said he wants to fight Vitali after Wlad should he beat him, so again, what's the problem? And it shouldn't really be up to him who he fights, because Vitali would be the fight everybody wants. It then doesn't allow him to go back and start fighting stiffs like Harrison again.
     
  11. BeaverDan

    BeaverDan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,834
    108
    Jul 23, 2007
    That's right. But through all 3 of the fights, Haye wouldn't be the one making the majority of the money.

    Nobody is bothered about rematch clauses, but sewing up the next 3 fights is a bit over the top. It is indeed a slave contract.
     
  12. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    That's supposed to be insult??? :lol:
     
  13. uraharakisuke

    uraharakisuke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,518
    0
    Jan 10, 2010
    Well it kind of was...
     
  14. BeaverDan

    BeaverDan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,834
    108
    Jul 23, 2007
    You're under 16, aren't you?

    Got to be.
     
  15. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Why should he make the majority? He's being offered 50/50 down the middle to fight either of them. He's lucky to even be getting that against Wlad.