whats worse 1 RND KO or 12 RND schooling?

I also thought Tarver knocking Roy out in the second, was better than schooling him for 12 rounds like he did the 3rd fight.... At least then I could say Roy just got caught will a killer punch, after the 3rd fight, all I could say is Roy Jones is done for good, which broke my heart.

 

that's really the essence of the argument.

a lot depends on the fighter, circumstance and the fighter (and his rep) who beat him.

nobody's going to judge paul williams because he had his chance to redeem himself and did it in style.

but nobody's going to judge roy jones too(for losing to tarver) for different reasons.

it all depends on the fighter and circumstance.

 

without the point deduction then yes you are right but i scored it 119 - 103

 

Easy answer...who's worse off now? Paul Williams or Quintana?

 

12 rounds for me.

 

Fans forget the schooling if the fighter improves or gets back on track. But never the KO.

 

its not about that....

 

Getting beat for 12 rounds is more embarrassing because you can make excuses for getting cold cocked in the first, but you can't make excuses for being beating for 12 rounds straight.

 

depends on the situation.

in the am's there is no excuse, for sure, but in the pro's it depends on a lot of things.

 

1st rd K.O is more worse...bec it means u have a weak/glass chin or you're a bum/patsy

 

no it doesn't. not always.

 

Priceless! That post is win :thumbsup :rofl

 

aye. its incredible someone can say that and it shows they dont want to let go of their allegiances.

 

12 rd schooling, you can always say it was a lucky punch or some **** for the 1 rd Ko... :-D

 

12 round schooling....not on the same level. 1 rnd ko...may be just caught, but can also be not on the same level, depending on the manner of ko