whats worse 1 RND KO or 12 RND schooling?

yer, its funny because there's not an exact rule as it effects different fighters in different ways. however if a fighter is schooled for 12 rounds unless theres no way to go for the winner or some other strange circumstance there ain't gonna be a rematch. whereas a 1 round KO people immedietly ask for a rematch to see if it was a fluke or not

 

i've come to the conclusion that in general a 12 round schooling/beating is worse

 

what are the best examples of some1 KO'd in the first round but came back better?

 

probabily goes in line with what he was trying to say atsch

 

any examples of fighters schooled/beaten for 12 rounds but came back better? i'm talking about a lacy style schooling

no1 say quintana/williams because carlos pick-pocketed the fight

 

would you say a 1 Round KO is more worse in the casual fans eye (low attention span, lust for a KO) and a 12 schooling is worse in the eye of the more understanding officianado as the die-hards are looking at the overall

 

diaz is very recent and good example people forget the punishment he took in the nate fight