What's worse: Canelo-Khan or Golovkin Brook?

Yeh right, brook is 147 through and through

 

Khan moved up 8 lbs
Brook will move up 13 lbs

 

A big welterweight makes a tiny middleweight and a small light middle weight

 

I hate GGG now and you fans are to blame lol

How can you say with a straight face Canelo is worse?

This is pathetic and you fans are pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

In terms of competitiveness both fights are poor, but the situation behind these fights is quite different.

Brook is risking his 0 unlike Khan and GGG was being ducked by everyone else so it's not like people were queuing up to fight him.

Anyone know if this is at a catch weight or is Brook going all the way up to 160lbs?

 

According to some of these posts... Brook is like 7ft tall & cutting 70lbs per fight. #BigWelterweight

 

You have no shame when it comes to Golovkin, do you?

 

Depends.

Is GGG dragging Brook all the way up to 160, or is he at least doing a catchweight?

 

All the damn way up, and remember GGG is soooooooooo small (****en bs)

 

You won't get a serious response to this. I don't like the fight, but it is better than canelo and Khan's farce.

Funny thing is, to most of these guys, Canelo > 3G and we all know Brook > Khan..

So a worse fighter than canelo (According to most here) is taking on a better opponent than Cenelo had in Khan. Seems pretty clear to me which one was worse.

 

Oh come on. This isn't even close. As bad of a fight as Brook vs GGG is... Canelo vs Khan was FAR worse. Khan has been rocked in damn near every fight he's been in going life and death with nobodies.

GGG vs Brook is garbage doe.

 

hopefully Hearn can and will let Eubank rot.

 

@ all the Golovstans and their alts

 

I'm predicting GGG vs. Eubank in Dec...
Alvarez Vs. Saunders double header on HBO