What's Your Opinion of Harold Lederman's Scoring?

I wonder, has he ever told it to anyone other than Jim?

Anyway, his scores seem solid normally, but like everyone he has his strange scores as well, I think he scored the last round in Pac-Marquez II for Pac which was a clearly a Marquez round.

 

Not good, he scores aggression no matter how ineffective it is. He had Molina beating DLH, Trinidad-DLH a draw, and a host of other decisions where he gives the guy going forward all the credit.

 

Prime example of what I was talking about. Castillo got points for coming forward just for the sake of coming forward, even in the rounds where he was ineffective and people who hate Floyd run with it. No way castillo earned that win. Just like people who hated DLH ran with Ledermans score in the Molina-DLH fight.

 

I agree with this

 

I guess the other two on the broadcast team would rather hear nothing of it! :rofl:yep

 

I think he's ****ing terrible. Even when I come to the same conclusion on our scorecards we usually got there in tottally different ways. One thing he does that I don't agree with is that he scores in favor of aggression even when that aggression may not be very effective. Basically, I consider him no better than any other **** up judge out there.

 

Very good 90% of the time but no one can be right 100% so he's about as good as it gets.