What's your take on Marciano KO1 Walcott?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Oct 14, 2009.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,940
    47,981
    Mar 21, 2007
    It seems to me, sometimes, that Marciano gets more credit for being beaten up and then stopping Walcott late than he does the KO1. Thinking seems to be that a) Walcott quit or b) Rocky destroyed Walcott in the first fight or c) Jersey Joe misjudged the count , but it's still a KO1 over a top 20 (usually) HW.

    What's your own view? Was Walcott past it, and the win therefore worthless? What of the fact that he looked so wonderful in the first fight with Marciano? Regardless of your feelings, how highly do you rate the win? What is it comarable to? People cream over Tyson-Spinks, Walcott is a better HW than Spinks...your thoughts?

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHxXLKLelOQ&feature=PlayList&p=7EFC8182AC968019&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=6[/ame]
     
  2. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    This was a precursor of Chuvalo-Quarry. Rocky decked Joe, who lost the count, simple as that. (Standing eight counts were not the rule then.)

    It's too bad the rematch had to end like that, as it might have been another classic confrontation. Marciano does deserve credit for getting off to a fast start though.
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Either that or Joe just thought 'F*ck it'
     
  4. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,046
    Oct 25, 2006
    Walcott grew old in a single round.
    The way I see it, he was probably feeling full of pep and enthusiasm going in, but when he was dropped by that right, all those memories of the first fight came flooding back and he decided to sit it out.

    I suppose one could equate that to an old guy who used to jog, then one day decides to run around the local park. He limbers up and starts off, but after a few minutes he gets a stitch and remembers his age...and limps off home, deflated.

    I'm not calling Jersey Joe a coward. He had paid his dues as a fighter and had surrendered the title after a very hard fight.
    Maybe as he was taking the count, he thought to himself: "Is this really worth it anymore?"
    Maybe it wasn't really even a concious thought.

    But the position in which he took the count (on his bum) and the way he suddenly jumped up right after the ten count suggests he had no interest in rising when he should have.

    It was a decent win for Rocky, but I've always felt Walcott could have gotten up.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,940
    47,981
    Mar 21, 2007
    Curious buddy, do you feel this way about all first round KO's?

    How about this: you have to make your man quit.





    Anyone got a take on my Tyson-Spinks comparison?
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,940
    47,981
    Mar 21, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  7. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    That's an interesting point, and I've always felt Marciano deserved more credit than he gets for this performance.

    He started off fast (in contrast to the first fight, or most of his fights in general), kept Walcott off balance, and then took him out with a sneak right that Walcott never saw coming. Of course Walcott was "old" then - but when wasn't he old? :lol: He was still good enough to have been the legitimate undisputed HW champ only the year before, and had twice beaten a HOF champ in Ezzard (once by shocking KO). No one else had ever taken out Walcott like that before, and no really one expected Rocky to - and that alone means Rocky deserves some degree of credit IMO.

    This is a fight that should probably be considered Rocky's defining moment (like his own Tyson-Spinks fight) yet it's a case of a fight being totally dismissed because of a presumed excuse. I do agree Walcott may possibly have said "No mas" after he was dropped, but I don't agree with the notion that he outright "took a dive" the way Liston did in the Ali rematch. I would say the outcome is more comparable to Tyson-Spinks, in which Walcott/Spinks actually did show up to fight, but possibly became discouraged after feeling his opponent's power and then perhaps "quit" after he was dropped. The punch that floored Walcott was a legitimate great punch and Walcott never saw it coming. I think if you make a guy quit with the force of your fists (which is assuming Walcott actually did "quit" - only he could ever really know that) then you deserve as much credit as if you knocked him unconscious.
     
  8. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,046
    Oct 25, 2006
    Sure. That's part of what I was saying...after he felt that power again, the memories came flooding back. Of course, nobody know for sure. It was a decent shot, no doubt. I just feel Walcott could have gotten up.

    It's interesting that Rocky started more quickly though, don't you think? Either he didn't want to fall behind early again, or Goldman, being the crafty old fox he was, thought that Walcott was there to be gotten rid of quickly.

    I'm not sure how much of a comparison one can draw to Tyson v Spinks and this fight.
    The circumstances were entirely different.
    Tyson v Spinks was a battle between two undefeated fighters, one being the lineal champ and the other holding all the belts.
    Spinks was finished from that Tyson right and could not have gotten up if the count reached 50.

    What's your take on the 2nd Walcott fight?
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,940
    47,981
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I agree with almost everything here. Not only had he done Ezzard and been champ shortly before, he also turned in perhaps his best surviving filmed performance against Rocky in his very last fight...there are other contenders, of course, and from what i've seen of Louis I, that might have been even better boxing, and there are other contenders, but still...he looked like a genuine top drawer fighter something like 9 months earlier?
     
  10. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,940
    47,981
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think the former. Rocky had horrible trouble in the first round of the first fight after all.

    Sure, but Tyson is seen as a sort of God on that night even though Spinks is seen by many as semi-beaten before he stepped in? Whereas Walcott, also seen as semi-beaten by some before he got in, is seen as a compromised win for Marcaino? I think there are parallels, but for some reason Marciano comes off worse...though your point about Spinks's status is well made (though let's not forget that Walcott was ex-champ by one fight only).


    Great win.
     
  12. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    Lets be honest here, Walcott was nearly 40 years of age and had been violently knocked out in the fight before it. Not just knocked out, but knocked out cold. There's no way he was the same man that fought Rocky 9 months earlier.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,940
    47,981
    Mar 21, 2007

    Sure, but he was getting alone when Louis smashed his head in, too, but went on to beat Charles, Johson, Hoff etc. as well as turn in that great performance against Rocky...he had loads of rest and we have under three minutes of footage to draw the conculsion that there was "no way he was the same man" he was before...I think that's a big shout chum, actually, based on what we have.

    Not that you are wrong, but I don't know that there is enough there for me to be able to hop on board.
     
  14. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    He was 34 years old then though and didn't have all those fights against Charles, Johnson, Hoff, Layne, Marciano then, many of them tough fights. He also didn't go onto beat anybody after the first round KO loss to Marciano but instead retired for good.

    The fact that the fight only lasted 3 minutes, with Walcott putting up little resistance, and being blown away in one round pretty much shows, in my opinion, that he was badly faded since the first fight.

    This was the man who nearly blew Marciano himself away in the very first round.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,940
    47,981
    Mar 21, 2007

    Well - he might have been badly faded. But what i'm saying is, the previous performance was pretty special - very special maybe? - for a losing performance, and he was KO'd in 1 by a great HW puncher in his next fight. So where does the proof lie? In his timly retirement? I just don't see enough to toss out that judgement automatically.