When a close fight became a robbery.

You’re right, it’s such a close fight that could’ve went either way that the majority of scorecards all over the Internet favored Loma.

 

could have gone either way…except it didn’t, and went to the fighter with a future

funny how that always happens

 

Cough Clenelo GGG Cough

 

The fact that you felt the need to go out of your way to start another thread on this shows you are in some way emotionally invested, so your thought process naturally is clouded. Just watch the fight again with the volume down and with your emotions intact. You will see why everyone except you thinks Loma won. On the other hand you can just take offence to my reply and remain emotional, and give me a pointless reply. Your choice

 

So, if it was a close fight, and wasn’t a robbery - how the hell did Haney win 118-110?

Turn the other cheek, this is no different than GGG vs Canelo 1.

Boxing is ****ed. This is the reason undefeated fighters refuse to fight each other now.

 

It went for the home fighter. It always does.

IT was close, but clear.

 

Who gives a **** what dumbass mouthbreathers on the internet who by in large, don't like Haney and love Lomachenko think? Since when has ad populum been a good argument?

You could post a video of Mayweather boxing a rock and people hate him so much they'd say he lost lol, Haney's in the same boat.

"The majority of the internet says it's true" wtf

 

Well said. The truth.

 

Not mine, not many others' who dont feel like to argue because they know that it's dumb (I do it out of boredom) and, definetly, not the judges'.

 

Moretti gave round 10 to Haney.

 

I had Loma edging it but is no robbery IMO by any means it was very close.

 

Winning the fight is different to winning the story, and quite often people get the 2 mixed up.

This was a very very close fight, however Loma was definitely won the story of the fight

 

Wilder Fury 1 was a robbery

Loma Haney was a robbery

Both had a corrupt paid off Judge