When a fighter with less fights is considered a step up to the fighter with more

When the fighter with less or same amount of fights is considered a step up to the fighter with more fights on his record

Jacobs 20-0-0 (vs) Pirog 16-0-0. Pirog had less fights but fought at a far higher level, beating fighters like Ajetovic and Jantuah

Pavlik 31-0-0 (vs) Taylor 27-0-1. Pavlik had, had more fights, but Taylor was the more accomplished fighter, with a record of 4-0-1 in world title fights.

Bute 30-0-0 (vs) Froch 28-0-0. Both had, had 30 fights and both had mixed in world class. Froch was 5-2-0 in world title fights and had only once been a convincing winner. Bute was 10-0-0 in world title fights, yet it was Froch who was considered the step up for Bute.

Give me some more examples

 

32-1-0 Pernell Whitaker was a step up for 87-0-0 Chavez

 

I never thought of that, and what a fantastic example. I was thinking even about some of Tysons early title fights

 

Holy-Bowe 1

Holy (28-0) was a big step up for Bowe's (31-0) 1st title fight. Holy had been a pro for 4 more years & won a world title in his 13th fight.

 

Add 214+ AM fights for Pea.

 

most guys Yori Boy Campas fought.

 

When Campus fought Tito

 

foreman had more fights than frazier, but frazier was looked upon as a huge step up.

 

Ricky Hatton (38-0) vs Kostya Tszyu (31-1)

 

Everyone rigo has fought and 98% of the fighters he could fight in the future.

 

Possibly the best example :good

 

Good call.

Few others:

Honey-Curry
Mercer-Morrison
Bruno-Spoon

 

Alvarez againast most true contenders at 154. If he does.

 

Khan Salita

 

Salvador Sanchez 40-1-1 (31 KOs) vs Wilfredo Gomez 32-0-1 (32 KOs)