When and if Wlad beats Tyson...will he be above Lennox on the ATG list??

Wlad beats Fury, Wilder and Glazkov he will have 21 consecutive title defenses and all 5 belts.

He will be ranked above Lennox. You're going to have to deal with it sooner or later; just wanted to give you a heads up so you can handle your emotions appropriately.

 

I prefer reality, something you ought to deal with before anyone deals with fanfiction.

 

You don't think Wlad gets to 21 consecutive title defenses or that Wlad will be ranked better than Lewis?

Most posters on here voted for Larry to be ranked the 3rd best HW of All-Time. If Wladdy can get all 5 belts (when Larry never unified 2 belts) and beat Holmes' 20 defenses; Wlad should be ranked 3rd.

 

Wlad has 3 KO losses to nobodies. Besides that, Norton has the better resume...

 

Wlad's record against Sanders: 0-1
Wlad's record against Purrity: 0-1
Wlad's record against Brewter with two good eyes: 0-1

 

:deal

 

His win over Ruddock is better than ANYTHING Wlad has done, except maybe getting KO'd by Sanders. :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

The reality is that Wlad is already ahead of Lewis. He has been fighting at a world class level for 19 years for ducks sake.

 

This

 

If you seriously think that you're either a massive Wlad fanboy or you have braindamage, which of the two options is it?

Lewis would beat him if they ever fought, Lewis has fought better fighters, Lewis is better H2H against other Heavyweights, Lewis avenged his losses, Lewis is higher ATG, Lewis is better in every factor.

Lewis > Wlad ATG, and that's how history will remember it.

 

Norton has no record at all.

 

I'd rather you didn't ask me questions unrelated entirely to the topic in hand, this is a boxing thread, not fanfiction.
I can invent anything I want as a counterargument if your argument is an invention.


for the 2nd time of saying.

 

We've been listening to these mug street bums like Gee and Dino for over ten years. Guess who is still champ, zipperheads? :deal

 

Seeing as how Wladimir is the number one heavy weight of all time, that by default already makes him ranked ahead of Louis. No, I did not spell that wrong.

 

You missed the point...Holmes won only a controversial and disputed win over a guy who lost to nobodies. It wasn't some great win.

As for Norton having a better resume, he simply does not. He beat a past 30 Ali, a way past it Quarry, and not much else of note. You are simply incorrect.