When and if Wlad beats Tyson...will he be above Lennox on the ATG list??

Fury would probably give any boxer prior to 2003 trouble....

 

Lewis was not as good technically, he relied on dirty boxing all too often, had a chin no better than Wlad, put in some really poor displays over the years like Mercer, a fight he lost. Nobody has come close to Wlad in ten years and he's fought every name except his brother. Fury is another guy who would have beaten most of Lewis's challengers.

 

[yt]xOCekaYXwvA[/yt]

30:47

Wladimir's chin makes Lennox's look like granite- Jim Lampley. :yep

 

[yt]inehc0s0rDs[/yt]



Never been brutally one punch KO'd like this though.... :rofl

 

Had it been Wlad instead of Lewis on that night, he would have been ko'd too. :yep

Wlad's been down like 13 times. :rofl:tired

 

I think Fury would deal with most of them, just going by Chisora, that was better than most of Lewis's challengers would have managed. Lewis was pretty crude at times with the left hand outstretched before the big right came in, like he was sizing up a pot on a snooker table. I never see wlad doing that, he's a very clean puncher. And be doesn't wear body protection up.to his arm.pits like Lewis. How he got away with that...

 

Unlike Lennox he actually gets up though

 

With the help of the ref, Yes I agree. :yep

Without the ref in the Brewster fight, he might still be on the canvas :nod:yep

 

Fury adds little to Wlad's resume, it's just another solid win but nothing outstanding. Fury has done nothing really other than beat Chisora twice and beat an always over rated Johnson and undersized Cunningham. So beating Fury doesn't rank him above Lewis.

Now if Wlad continues to dominate for a few more years and takes out some of the up and coming heavies like AJ and Parker then he is definitely top 10 and it could be argued he's around that level of Lewis but it would come down to what some of the young guys he's beaten achieve after he retires.

 

Just when you think you have seen everything :rofl:rofl:rofl

You either haven't seen the fight or your braindead, which one is it?

Lewis was a far superior fighter to Wlad, if they met head to head it would be a savage KO win for Lewis, lets not even go there shall we.

Lewis is the superior fighter, Lewis has fought much stronger competition in a much stronger era, Lewis ranks ahead H2H vs other heavyweights of other eras.

Also Lewis avenged both his KO losses in spectacular fashion where as Waldo shamelessly ducked a Sanders rematch because he knew he would lose again, and got his older brother(a Lewis victim) to do the dirty work for him, pathetic really.

Nobodies come close to beating Wlad in 10 years because the HW division is **** poor and has been the laughing stock of the fighting world during that time, filled with overweight fat tomato cans, most of them on Wlads resume. Had Wlad fought in the Lewis era against the likes of himself, Bowe, Holyfield, Ruddock, Tyson, Bruno etc he would have been starched more than 3 times. If he had the stones to rematch Sanders he would have been starched again then, this hurts his resume BADLY.

You think Lewis couldn't have performed the same streak as Wlad had he not been fighting in this era too? Don't make me laugh.

WRONG AGAIN, Fury would not have beaten most of Lewis challengers, he gets floored by people with extremely low KO percentages and feather fisted Cruiserweights. You can't seriously believe Fury is anything other than a Glass Jaw'd clown, if Wlad doesn't starch this joke early then he should retire and not have to make us watch his jab hold hold snoozefest fights any longer.

Lewis > Wlad if they ever fought
Lewis > Wlad resume
Lewis > Wlad H2H
Lewis > Wlad ATG

And thats how it will be remembered.

 

I stopped reading when you said he avenged both KO losses in spectacular fashion. atsch

 

I probably shouldn't respond to someone whose shown himself to consistently be the dumbest, most irrational, and yes, even grammatically poor poster on this board (you make dino seem like a scholar). Nevertheless, if you knew boxing history at ll, you'd know I was talking about Chris Byrd. He's one of the 3 or 4 best non K's since Lennox, so yes, a very credible champ

 

:deal

And there you have it. To be completely honest, the whole attempt to compare Wlad to Lennox is beyond silly. Lewis is in another class...