When Biased Commentary Goes Wrong. Is AB vs Maidana the worst commentary of all time

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hamiltonporter, Dec 14, 2013.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,322
    11,366
    Jan 6, 2007

    Like, you're blind or deaf or both.


    This post is mostly a load of shyte.

    Where do you guys get this **** ?



    At no point did any of the Showtime commentators post scores that had Broner ahead. Paulie had it even after six. (Not good, but he was one out of three, and he didn't have Broner ahead.)


    SHOWTIME SCORES:

    After six:

    Bernstein 58 : 55 for Maidana
    Farhood:..57 : 55 for Maidana
    Paulie: Even.


    After Twelve:

    Bernstein 115 : 111 for Maidana
    Farhood:..114 : 111 for Maidana
    Paulie: 115: 111 for Maidana


    Paulie complained several times that the ref should have penalized Broner for holding, and he stated flatly that Broner was 'acting' to try to get an unwarranted DQ after an insignificant headbutt.


    BTW, Lampley and Kellerman combined, couldn't carry Al Bernstein's microphone.
     
  2. miketysonko

    miketysonko Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,371
    317
    Dec 29, 2006
    Go watch the fight again, they had Maidana in front after 6 you fool!!! Worst thread of the month
     
  3. rorschach51

    rorschach51 A Legend & A Gentleman Full Member

    12,195
    8,406
    Feb 18, 2012
    The TS is a complete dumbass, Paulie for some inexplicable reason had it a draw after 6. Al and Steve both had Maidana comfortably ahead, hell Al said before ring intro's that he went back and watched Paulie/Broner and Paulie should've won or at least drew that fight. That doesn't sound like bias towards Broner to me. You got something wrong with you, if you think Kellerman and Lampley are better than Al Bernstein.