When brook hold porter it's strategy ...

Brook was hitting Porter with point scoring punches every time he came in, Broner was running and holding.

 

Not even worthy of an answer.

If you cannot see the difference between what Brook did and what Broner did, then any explanation would be wasted.

 

It's because Broner is an @ss :rofl

 

Broner throw 2 punches a round. a total of 24 punches in the fight and only 1 landed in the last round.

 

Broner was disgraceful he held all night ,used the forearm and heeled.I'm very glad the big mouthed c*nt was exposed for what he is,a front running showboat who has no idea how to fight inside and no appetite for a war.
The referee was far too lenient, Broner should have had points deducted long before he did.

 

With porters rush and smother style, he porter maynot initiate the clenches but he is the cause of them. I don't favor porters wrestling mma boxing style, it's ugly and hard to appreciate. Broner is a low output pot shot type of fighter, I knew once the fight was made this is how it would play out.

I look at it like this poter fought how he wanted, and Broner did the best he could to deal with it. It's the refs job to regulate the fight. Weeks these days seems to let anything go. Blame the ref for not doing something earlier in the fight.

 

true. the hypocrisy is pretty hilarious.

 

not even close to comparison

be intrested to see what broner threw against porter and what kell threw

 

or danny holding lucas

 

:deal

 

Weeks was just calling things "straight down the middle" guys [emoji38]

 

In my view, Brook should have been disqualified for his holding.

I would like to see refs enforce the rules on holding more strictly. That would certainly make the sport of boxing more popular again.

 

Brook was holding too, all the time.

Nobody wants to see this constant holdings, it turns people off and away from boxing. We need ref who enforce the rules more strictly.

 

At least a point deducted, Brook might have held less then.