When brook hold porter it's strategy ...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Console Command, Jun 22, 2015.


  1. dannyc1990

    dannyc1990 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    111
    Apr 25, 2013
    The problem is that brook was scoring with his own punches, broner hardly even through anything so when you see a guy moving holding and not punching they're going to lose.... brook was clearly trying to keep porter at range with his jab and straight right and then when porter closes to distance, smother his wold swinging and rabbit punching... thats why its a strategy...
     
  2. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,920
    16,986
    Jul 25, 2014
    :mj:dance
     
  3. HitBattousai

    HitBattousai Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,076
    16
    May 6, 2006
    Brook did clinch excessively in the first half of his fight with Porter and should have lost a point somewhere in there. That said, while still excessive, it was not even close to the insane degree that Broner did it and Brook did a better job of slipping in quality shots as Porter was coming in, curbing his aggression a little.

    I do think there should be some sort of universal referendum on clinching. It's ridiculous that some fighters are using it as a crutch to avoid engaging on the inside at all, and that use of it as a strategy appears to be becoming more prevalent.
     
  4. Console Command

    Console Command Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,003
    7
    Jul 27, 2014
    so if you punch & hit it's fine to hold ? Than you must be the greatest Wlad fan ! Glad to see someone who appreciate his work like me :)