That is important yes .I'm saying what will be the excuses be when it does happen. I want to hear them . And he ain't my lion this is just a debate. Whether jermall wins or loses I could give a dam he ain't my fighter .
Hell yea you can that's part of the debate. I'm asking about the excuses People will use when jermall beats GGG Jacobs or Andrade. Like if they favor a 37 year old GGG to beat jermall then that means they see GGG as still strong . If jermall were to beat ggg then they would have to give credit to jermall seeing as they still had faith in their fighter
Ok then we have to take away credit from all the fighters whoever fought guys out of their prime. That includes Manny beating Oscar delahoya when he was 40. We have to apply the same logic. There as well.
This is a troll thread by a troll ggg hater who constantly reprimands ggg fanboys. I can't roll my eyes enough at this guy. Hating n fanboyism are two sides of the same troll coin. GGG probably smokes charlo. Canelo smokes him as well. Same goes for Andrade. Who's best win is vanes who ggg got hell for even fighting. And Andrades win in said fight is questionable. Educate yourself.
Still he beat a past prime Oscar Del hoya weight drained .... Oooh and Mosley was 40 as well when PAC fought him
Pac went up two weight classes. Can't ignore that. And Mosely was bigger, stronger, and the much bigger puncher of the two. The styles also favored Mosely. That left hand that dropped him had him running for survival the rest of the fight. But he went on to go toe-to-toe Canelo and never running once. Don't be a hater. Give credit.
Follow your advice . If a fighter beats another despite the age give credit .don't just apply certain logic and certain logic just because it applies to your fighter
Already gave you logic. You're asking what will the "excuses (troll much?)" be when a hypothetical scenario that will probably never happen happens. Where's the logic there? You want a logical debate ask a logical question.