Your simple mind is simple. You're just trying to hard now. Just abandon the thread and hope that one remembers this horrific schooling.
Schooling what schooling what have you even schooled me in ? Just me pointing out the flaws in Pacquiaos Victories
What L ? Am I not right ? Was de la hoya not 40 years old and drained at the time ? De la hoya previous 7 bouts we're fought at 154 and 160 . De la hoya had moved up to 154 in 2001 and had not fought at 147 for 7 years. Fought pac drained at 40 years old ? Is that not true ?
Deep breath ? You aren't even answering the question ? But if that's how you want to end the debate fine then . Let's agree to disagree
Dude, you're bordering on pure silliness. Gvozdyk wasn't "praised" or "given credit" for beating Stevenson. Stevenson was just an unlikable guy who blatantly ducked kov and pimped underage girls. People were just happy he got beat up. Most knowledgeable fans were pretty confident gvozdyk would win anyway. As you said, styles make fights. The main thing here though is that gvozdyk did in fact beat Stevenson. Charlo has not beaten GGG. He hasn't accomplished anything to suggest he could. He struggled with guys at 154. He was schooled by an inactive old korobov. What is it you're seeing that suggests he would beat trip? Or Jacobs for that matter. Or even korobov in a rematch? You've no foundation for those assumptions. You are saying that since gvozdyk got praised for beating Stevenson, an actual occurrence, that charlo will deserve praise if by some strange occurrence he got the ggg fight and then in a stranger occurrence he won...I mean...what? You're vehemently arguing that charlo deserves credit for something that will most likely never happen as if it has happened and triple g fanboys are refusing to give him due praise. What kind of exercise in ******ed is this?
"When Charlo beats GGG Andrade or Jacobs"...Pfff these troll boys can't hide there true colours , is seeps to the top....