When did the modern era begin

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GPater11093, May 14, 2009.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    I haven't read the rest of this thread so i'm kind of bugging in, but i would like to comment here that there's a difference between a few freaks of nature being able to get away with low hands (Ali, speed, Jones, speed, VK, size, speed and only holds the left low) and boxers fundamentally having low hands, i.e. nearly all of them.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    It is hard to say for sure.

    They would have had a skillset as intricate in its own right as that of modern fighters but I dont know what it would look like if you saw it.

    Jem Mace was a complete box of tricks. In his late 50s he fought an exhibition with Tommy Ryan and gave him pleanty of problems. Around the same time he fought Burke who held Jim Corbett to a draw by some acounts and some papers said he had the better of it. Joe Goss was the American/world heavyweight champion aged 37 but when Mace fought the prime Goss he just toyed with him.

    Jawn L Sullivan is a primaevel monster. Reconstructing his style is like fleshing out a dinosaur. Based on contemporary acounts he seems to have had a style that was a hybrid between Jack Dempsey and Floyd Patterson. I will post an article justifying this statment in detail soon.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    Do you think that these early boxers never thought to raise their hands slightly to protect themselves?

    Presumably around 1940 an obelisk apeared in the sky and a boxer lifted his hands up and thus a new era was born.

    Presumably you rate Carl Froch among these "freaks of nature".
     
  4. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    You can make jokes about it, but it's true. Watch any film from heavyweights pre-1930's. They carry their hands by the waist whenever they can; evolutionary inheritance from centuries of bare knuckle boxing.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,822
    51,905
    Mar 21, 2007

    Yeah, I agree with that, but if I say to somebody, "tell me why Langford's style wouldn mean he will struggle in the modern era", low hands will be near the top of a lot of poster's lists. But he fits into your freak of nature category. Imagine a MW Langford wearing low hands, encouraging the opponent to lead and then countering with angled body-shots. The mind ****ing boggles.

    I agree that Joe Bloggs, Circa 1909 48-19 wouldn't be advised to hold his hands low if he was zapped into the here and now but it wouldn't spell doom for every fighter...as you've suggested, I think.

    Don't go Boxrecing Joe Bloggs anyone, by the way, I made him up.
     
  6. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
    When did the top black and white boxers start fighting each other on a regular basis?
     
  7. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    The modern era started on Queesberry gloves rules which required gloves, a set number of rounds, the count for knocked down fighters, and a square ring.
     
  8. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    10,718
    8
    Aug 4, 2008
    Oh... so modern boxing began in the USA did it????

    Interestingly enough, both England and Australia had been conducting national H/W title bouts under Marquis rules since the latter part of the 1870's.

    The mediocrty of Sullivans H/W title reign can be accoutable for the delayed effects on the USA scene. Sullivan seemingly didnt know if he was a Prize Ring Champ or a gloved champ.
     
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    look forward t the articule didnt know taht about Mace maybe i am wrng and the fighters from then are a lot better technically than i give them credit for. But on film fighters from the 1900s-1910s arnt very impressive technically for me. dont get me wrong for there day and the type of boxing it was technical but not for today
     
  10. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    I voted for the 1930s.

    The '20s did feature some fighters with modern era style/form, like Benny Leonard, but they were exceptions in that time, and in fact it's part of what made them so unique and successful.

    I believe the '30s is when there was an earnest transition from the "old school" era to the modern one, with fighters like Armstrong, Ross, Schmeling, and others. It essentially was the decade of transition. By the '40s, I'd say the modern era was in full swing.