Dude, you think you're boyfriend Pacquiao is the best Featherweight of the last decade. Why don't you **** off...and take your zero credibility with you.
That's cool....... He just rubbed me the wrong way when he claimed I had never seen Ayala fight before..... Why did he say that to me? Was it because I refused to state Ayala was a great fighter?? I NEVER said Ayala was a bad fighter... NO!! NEVER!!! I just said he wasn't great... I also have stated that Ayala's best opponent on his resume is Yory Boy Campas from 2000..... And T.A. was already way past his best days and nights as a fighter in 2000...... And, for the record, broke hands or not, Ayala was TKO'd by Campas...... That's the truth right there........ thumbsup:hat MR.BILL
No, because after Tony went to jail, Duran then beat a washed up Cuevas, and savaged Moore with help of a thumb in the eye, and went the distance with a passive Hagler. People like you got back on the Duran bandwagon, which has been growing ever since. Oh wait, were you even around then?
i dont know man, gonzalez looks a bit special. this little run he has is pretty good. not just the competition he has beaten but also the way he has done it. i dont give joyi a major chance but i think he could do it. actually taking a step back the 106 division is getting pretty stacked now. interesting that 5 years ago it was a *******ized fly division now it's taking on a personality of it's own oh yeah and to relate it to the thread i thought straweight and minimum weight where different... "i mean it had to be. Ricardo Marquez went up 2 divisions to fight Alverez Rosando minimumweight then over straw then to light fly"
:rofl He's not a promoter he asks people from his gym if they want to fight Zelenoff. AS re. boxing greenery; like anything else I realize my ignorance all the time - I thought Pac had about 0% chance of beating Cotto, for example.
When I was about ten I thought that either Lennox Lewis or Shawn Michaels was the hardest man in the world, and wondered why they didn't fight
I was just ****ing wiht you guy. I consider Pac the best featherweight of the last decade in what you would call "H2H ability". Who do you think is it? Barrera right? Well Barrera is up there but Pacquiao battering him from pillar to post at 126 would suggest that he was better at 126. Regardless if where you rank Pac you must admit that he is among the best featherweights of the last decade. On the other hand you said that Marciano barely makes it in as one of the top100 ATG fighters in history. douche. :smoke
fleaman is a scrawny little napoleon dynamite looking mother****er, that regurgitates quotes and assumes the opinions on fighters, of knowledgable boxing fans. He does not question the flavour of the month and takes it to extremes.
pachilles: the menstruating woman of ESB Philla, you know who I am. You talk****, **** off back to the general :good and what has me having glasses got to do with me being able to analyse the sport we're all here to talk about?
actually, I have no clue who you are and if I've had a conversation with you before, it seems to have marked you alot more than it did me.
On the thread subject, the first time I saw Ricardo Lopez I thought he was probably the most skilled boxer I would ever see. Now I notice alot more subtleties about a fighter's skillset than I did back then. Finito was still a master but he also had his flaws.