When, if ever has Pacquiao beaten a top fighter in their prime convincingly?

Jeff M, Jeff M, whereforth art thou Jeff M with the criteria and examples?.....

all by myself...
don't wanna be
all by myself...anymooooooooore!

 

To each his truth.

 

Jesus . . . you people are just feeding this troll. :-(

Just look at this . . .

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

:rofl :rofl :rofl

 

Jeff's no troll. He makes some great points. You're only calling him a troll cause he's saying things you don't like about your favourite fighter. Doesn't make him a troll!

 

i know i know, but i'm bored today and i consider paying attention to Jeff M as my good deed for the day.

 

ok, since you 2 are on the same page, maybe you can give us a criteria of what constitutes a "top fighter in [his] prime" and give some examples of fighters who have beaten top fighters in their prime convincingly.

using this criteria of yours, we can finally end the thread. [fat chance i know].

 

The thread itself is a bull**** thread intended to get attention, hatred and adversed reaction from other posters.

You've tried to come to the rescue of Finito once . . . now you rescuing Jeff M? :deal

 

Sure i'll stick up for him, cause he's not a troll. Like i said, he makes some great points. It only pains you guys because they're against Manny :smooch

 

No problem dude . . . it's your opinion. We're cool.

But this ass wipe . . . keep alleviating other posters with his bullshits . . . and that's what I hate.

An attention *****. :deal

You honestly believe that MAB, Morales, JMM, Diaz and Hatton are not in their primes?

 

there is no point to this argument. it will go on and on and on. as long as there are critics and there will always be.

if this is the case then and if all boxing analyst would think the way jeff m n radab then NO FIGHTER HAS EVER BEATEN ANYONE IN THEIR PRIME. NO ONE.

because the one who lost was 1. old
2. fought someone who got beat
3. a B fighter
4. any other reason jeff m can imagine..

 

He says things you like about your favorite fighter, and things you like about one of your hated fighters. So you love him for it.

It goes both ways. Nice try though.

 

exactly.:good
that's why i'm still waiting for jeff m to give us a criteria of a top fighter in their prime and some examples of fighters who beat top fighters convincingly in their prime.
but we all know that he loves attention and i'm feeling very humanitarian today.

 

Lol sasakul's record when the time pacquiao beat him is almost perfect. He only lost once to arbachacov who is the man of that division. Sasakul beat archabacov in the rematch. Lol it was in 1999 ashole what are u talking about. it seems like u doesnt know anything about the past ahaha.

Lol yeah barrera already have 60 fights when pac beat him but it doesnt mean that he is already past his prime lol barrera is in his near top form and top 3 p4p and also the king of the fetherwieght. lol so u are saying that barrera is shot when pac fought in their first fight? lol u are one dumb mofo..

Lol pac beat jmm in the record book. yeah it was not convincing but u cannot say it is a robbery win for pac. it is too close to call.

Lol as i said pls do ur self a favor and dont embarass ur self anymore. Why dont u make a thread about valero with the same topic? yeah u dont want to cause his resume is **** and doesnt deserve to be mention

 

oh and yah if ever pacman beats cotto this nov. he would a new reason to dicredit pacman.. "he beat a cracked drunk figther" rumors are (as i dont know if its true) in ESPN forums cotto seen drunk and sniffn "candy" somthing..