You don't know **** about their negotiations, true or false? Can you back up anything? You talk like you're in the middle of their negotiations but in reality you don't know **** except that WBA denied Jacobs 40% and followed their rules.
I know what everybody else knows . I know what has been all over the media- that Jacobs was denied 40%.. You'd have to be an utter simpleton not to know that very simple fact. He was denied 40%. Is that true or false. Simple question? Why can't you answer it?
Jacobs requested K2 give him a higher cut . They refused , so he filed a petition to the WBA to try make Loefler give him more money. The WBA sided with Loefler and stood firm on the 25-75 cut. Therefore Golovkin , Glovkins team , Golovkin Golovkin , Gennady Loefler denied him 40%. Are you trying to claim Team GGG wanted to give Jacobs his 40% , but it was the WBA who refused them both?
Don't know, haven't watched it in a while but it's defintley in the interview. And how was Hearn lying? He said Brook wanted to fight Golovkin. Who did Brook just fight?
So, what is the point? Does it even really matter who denied Jacobs the 40%? Golovkin, his team, the WBA, a combination of the 3 all leads to the same result. This all seems like a pointless discussion.
I'd like to see a Golovkin-Lara match up if it could be made due to politics but I don't see a problem with Golovkin not facing him. Lara doesn't have much of a fan base and fights on a different network and in a different division than Golovkin. If Lara really wanted to face Golovkin than he should think about moving to 160 and working his way to a mandatory shot. Golovkin has 3 titles and seems to want to hold onto them, I'm sure within a few fights he'd find himself in an eliminator for one of Golovkin's belts. It wouldn't hurt if Lara fought more than once or twice a year and didn't waste his time with guys like Rodriguez and Zaveck and instead fought other top fighters. If he really wants Golovkin than either earn a mandatory spot or create public demand and so far he's doing little to none of either.