When is Less Really More?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by booradley, Oct 17, 2007.


  1. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    With all the buzz lately about the various possible opponents for Kelly Pavlik I'v been wondering what others think about World Champions and Title Fights. Would you rather see a very busy champ who takes on a genuine threat maybe once a year, or would you rather that a world champion fight only the very best even if it means they only fight every 6-8 months? So what do ya think, and why do ya think it?

    Boo
     
  2. jimmy1991

    jimmy1991 Active Member Full Member

    1,406
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    yer thats a good point, i dont no whats better most of the top fighter only really fight every 5-6 months
     
  3. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,821
    593
    Jul 11, 2006
    fight as much as possible against anyone who is ranked high enough...keps you busy makes you more threatening on paper and the guys who are up for unifing have a justification to fight him becuase he is the best sort of thing.
     
  4. LogDog69

    LogDog69 Active Member Full Member

    1,245
    1
    Jul 18, 2007
    I prefer a champ that fights at least 4 times a year and takes on a genuine threat or is involved in a 50/50 fight at least once a year. This way you get to see more of your favorite fighter and a lot of fighters don't even face a genuine threat even once a year so having a genuine threat once a year would still be a step up for a lot of champions. :good
     
  5. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Same here
     
  6. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    LESS Jack Prescott on this forum = MORE Credibility for the site.